ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2024
GD-Net: An Integrated Multimodal Information Model Based on Deep Learning for Cancer Outcome Prediction and Informative Feature Selection.
Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Interpretable Omics-to-Image Transformer Framework for Cancer Prognosis Prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multimodal information provides valuable resources for cancer prognosis and survival prediction. However, the computational integration of this heterogeneous data information poses significant challenges due to the complex interactions between molecules from different biological modalities and the limited sample size. Here, we introduce GD-Net, a Graph Deep learning algorithm to enhance the accuracy of survival prediction with an average accuracy of 72% by early fusing of multimodal information, which includes an interpretable and lightweight XGBoost module to efficiently extract informative features. First, we applied GD-Net to eight cancer datasets and achieved superior performance compared to benchmarking methods, with an average 7.9% higher C-index value. The ablation experiments strongly supported that multi-modal integration could significantly improve accuracy over the single-modality model. In the deep case study of liver cancer, 319 differential genes, 15 differential miRNAs and 155 methylated differential genes based on the predicted risk subgroups are identified as the informative features, and then we have statistically and biologically validated the efficacy of these key molecules in internal and external test datasets. The comprehensive independent validations demonstrated that GD-Net is accurate and competitive in predicting different cancer outcomes in real-time, and it is an effective tool for identifying new multimodal prognosis biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.