ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Machine learning-informed liquid-liquid phase separation for personalized breast cancer treatment assessment.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-driven investigation on liquid-liquid phase separation-related prognostic signature in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Multi-cohort and single-cell profiling of aging genes reveals prognostic and therapeutic targets in breast cancer.iScience · 2026Article
- Mitochondrial electron transport chain gene-based prognostic model identifies SDHB as a key regulator of low-grade glioma progression and therapeutic target.Cancer cell international · 2025Article
- The treatment of breast cancer in the era of precision medicine.Cancer biology & medicine · 2025Review
- Personalized treatment decision-making using a machine learning-derived lactylation signature for breast cancer prognosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Evaluating AI-driven precision oncology for breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries: a review of machine learning performance, genomic data use, and clinical feasibility.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer, characterized by its heterogeneity, is a leading cause of mortality among women. The study aims to develop a Machine Learning-Derived Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation (MDLS) model to enhance the prognostic accuracy and personalized treatment strategies for breast cancer patients. Methods: The study employed ten machine learning algorithms to construct 108 algorithm combinations for the MDLS model. The robustness of the model was evaluated using multi-omics and single-cell data across 14 breast cancer cohorts, involving 9,723 patients. Genetic mutation, copy number alterations, and single-cell RNA sequencing were analyzed to understand the molecular mechanisms and predictive capabilities of the MDLS model. Immunotherapy targets were predicted by evaluating immune cell infiltration and immune checkpoint expression. Chemotherapy targets were identified through correlation analysis and drug responsiveness prediction. Results: The MDLS model demonstrated superior prognostic power, with a mean C-index of 0.649, outperforming 69 published signatures across ten cohorts. High-MDLS patients exhibited higher tumor mutation burden and distinct genomic alterations, including significant gene amplifications and deletions. Single-cell analysis revealed higher MDLS activity in tumor-aneuploid cells and identified key regulatory factors involved in MDLS progression. Cell-cell communication analysis indicated stronger interactions in high-MDLS groups, and immunotherapy response evaluation showed better outcomes for low-MDLS patients. Conclusion: The MDLS model offers a robust and precise tool for predicting breast cancer prognosis and tailoring personalized treatment strategies. Its integration of multi-omics and machine learning highlights its potential clinical applications, particularly in improving the effectiveness of immunotherapy and identifying therapeutic targets for high-MDLS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.