Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39628558›Full record

ArticleiScience2024

The gut microbiota confers resistance against

Matthew Turner, Landen Van Hulzen, Kylene Guse, Diing Agany, Jose E Pietri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparative Evaluation of Enrichment and Selective Culture Strategies for DetectingVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Experimental Evaluation of Fecal-Mediated Transfer ofJournal of tropical medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Diet has minimal effect onApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. ACS infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew TurnerUniversity of South Dakota, Sanford School of Medicine, Division of Basic Biomedical Sciences, Vermillion, SD, USA.
Landen Van HulzenUniversity of South Dakota, Sanford School of Medicine, Division of Basic Biomedical Sciences, Vermillion, SD, USA.
Kylene GuseUniversity of South Dakota, Sanford School of Medicine, Division of Basic Biomedical Sciences, Vermillion, SD, USA.
Diing AganyUniversity of South Dakota, Sanford School of Medicine, Division of Basic Biomedical Sciences, Vermillion, SD, USA.
Jose E PietriUniversity of South Dakota, Sanford School of Medicine, Division of Basic Biomedical Sciences, Vermillion, SD, USA.

Funding

Biological vector borne transmission of Salmonella by cockroachesR01AI171014 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA · PI Jose Enrique Pietri · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI171014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cockroaches exhibit unexplained intra- and interpopulation variation in susceptibility to

Indexed as

Biological sciencesMicrobiologyMicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID39628558
PMCPMC11612784

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.