ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2024
Patient experiences with a smartphone application dedicated to postoperative recovery after elective arthroplasty.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of the timing of initiation of a smartphone-based application on very short-term postoperative satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective observational study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the rapidly evolving landscape of digital health technologies, the widespread use of smartphones has paved the way for innovative applications designed to enhance healthcare experiences. This introduction underscores the global prevalence of smartphone users and their potential in healthcare, particularly exemplified by therapeutic apps such as the 'Post Op' smartphone application. Focused on postoperative support, this app prioritises user-friendly design, data recording, and adherence to national standards. The study aims to evaluate the app's success in achieving these objectives, highlighting its continuous improvement based on real user feedback and its potential impact on improving patient experiences and recovery processes. Methods and materials: A cohort of elective joint arthroplasty procedure patients at Kettering General Hospital (KGH), spanning a timeframe of one to 12 months post-surgery were surveyed over the telephone regarding their experience of the 'Post Op' smartphone utilising a custom, well-structured standardised questionnaire. Results: The study surveyed 42 consecutive patients who had undergone elective joint arthroplasty procedures at Kettering General Hospital, including 22 total hip replacement (THR) and 20 total knee replacement (TKR) patients. The respondents, with a median age of 66 years, provided overwhelmingly positive feedback about the 'Post Op' smartphone application. On a scale of 1-6, the mean ease-of-use score was 5.31, with only two THR patients providing lower scores due to difficulties with photography. However, the app's overall functionality, particularly in uploading photos, received a mean score of 4.78. Despite some technical issues, 97.6 % of respondents would recommend the app, emphasising its positive impact on confidence in the recovery and reducing unnecessary healthcare visits. Narrative responses highlighted the app's simplicity, support, and prompt communication with healthcare teams. Overall, the feedback indicates a high level of satisfaction with the 'Post Op' application among elective arthroplasty patients, showcasing its potential benefits for postoperative care. Conclusion: The study provides valuable insights into the impact of the 'Post Op' smartphone application on postoperative care, acknowledging both its successes and areas for enhancement. Further research and iterative improvements are crucial for optimising patient experiences and ensuring the app aligns effectively with healthcare needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.