Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39628931›Full record

ReviewEngineering microbiology2023

Engineering of

Yali Qiu, Meiling Wu, Haodong Bao, Weifeng Liu, Yu Shen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Engineering microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Metabolic engineering: Tools and applications.Engineering microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yali QiuState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Institute of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China.
Meiling WuAdvanced Medical Research Institute, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Haodong BaoState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Institute of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China.
Weifeng LiuState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Institute of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China.
Yu ShenState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Institute of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of non-food lignocellulosic biomass to produce ethanol fits into the strategy of a global circular economy with low dependence on fossil energy resources. Xylose is the second most abundant sugar in lignocellulosic hydrolysate, and its utilization in fermentation is a key issue in making the full use of raw plant materials for ethanol production and reduce production costs.

Indexed as

Evolutionary engineeringGlobal transcriptional regulationLignocelluloseMetabolic engineeringSaccharomyces cerevisiaeXylose

Identifiers

PMID39628931
PMCPMC11611035

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.