SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2024
Efficacy and safety of once-weekly insulin versus once-daily insulin in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly and Once-Daily Basal Insulins in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of once-weekly insulins in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026 · on this mapPooled it
- Efficacy and safety of once-weekly basal insulin therapy in people with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of liuwei dihuang pills (decoction) on early diabetic nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Once-Weekly Insulin Efsitora Alfa Versus Once Daily Insulin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This meta-analysis was performed to obtain a comprehensive overview of the differences between once-weekly basal insulin (including icodec and basal insulin Fc) and once-daily basal insulin (including glargine and degludec) in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for eligible studies up to 2 January 2024. Results: A total of 12 studies were included, comprising 5,895 patients, with 3,104 (52.7%) using once-weekly insulin and 2,791 (47.3%) using once-daily insulin. In the pooled data, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) change from baseline [mean difference (MD) -0.11%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.20 to -0.01%] and the odds of achieving an end-of-trial HbA1c <7% (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.13, 1.77) demonstrated a significantly good glycemic control in the once-weekly insulin group, especially in insulin-naïve type 2 diabetics or patients using icodec. Body weight increase for once-weekly insulin was 0.43 kg compared to controls (95% CI 0.09 to 0.76 kg). In addition, once-weekly insulin was correlated with a higher risk of level 1 hypoglycemia (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.6). There was no significant difference in fasting plasma glucose (MD 2.46 mg/dL; 95% CI -2.60 to 7.52 mg/dL), time in range (MD 2.03%; 95% CI -0.50 to 4.56%), and level 2 or 3 hypoglycemic events (OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.53). Conclusions: Once-weekly basal insulin is safe and effective in modestly reducing HbA1c with similar level 2 or 3 hypoglycemic events compared to once-daily insulin, although the risk of level 1 hypoglycemia and weight gain was slightly increased. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, Identifier CRD42024496812.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.