Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39629140›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2024

Cervical Rotation-Traction Manipulation for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials.

Tianxiao Feng, Xu Wang, Hanmei Bu, Kai Sun, Xiaokuan Qin, Rong Xie, Liguo Zhu, Xu Wei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tianxiao Feng *Academic Development Office, Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100102, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-7182-1741
Xu Wang *Academic Development Office, Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100102, People's Republic of China.
Hanmei BuAcademic Development Office, Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100102, People's Republic of China.
Kai SunBeijing Key Laboratory of Orthopedics of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100102, People's Republic of China.
Xiaokuan QinAcademic Development Office, Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100102, People's Republic of China.
Rong XieAcademic Development Office, Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100102, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0004-1559-2464
Liguo ZhuBeijing Key Laboratory of Orthopedics of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100102, People's Republic of China.
Xu WeiAcademic Development Office, Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100102, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6723-9604

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cervical radiculopathy (CR) is a common musculoskeletal disorder worldwide. Cervical rotation-traction manipulation (CRTM) is one of the representative technique in traditional Chinese orthopedics. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CRTM in treating CR. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted through eight databases to identify the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to December 2023. The primary outcome was the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes included Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), Cervical Range of Motion, cervical curvature, and adverse reactions and events. Two researchers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 15.0 software, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) system was used to assess the quality of the evidence. Results: A total of 9 RCTs involving 904 patients were included. The results indicated that CRTM significantly reduced VAS scores compared to control groups with low-quality evidence [ Conclusion: Cervical rotation-traction manipulation appears to be an effective and safe option for managing cervical radiculopathy, significantly improving pain and cervical mobility. However, further high-quality randomized controlled trials and methodological studies should be conducted to reinforce the evidence base for its clinical practice.

Indexed as

cervical radiculopathycervical range of motioncervical rotation-traction manipulationmeta-analysispainrandomized control trialsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39629140
PMCPMC11611706

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.