ReviewJournal of pain research2024
Cervical Rotation-Traction Manipulation for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials.
Review in Journal of pain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cervical Rotation-Traction Manipulation of Different Treatment Frequency in Cervical Radiculopathy: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Role of Exosomes from Nucleus Pulposus Cells in Attenuating Intervertebral Disc Degeneration by Inhibiting Nucleus Pulposus Cell Apoptosis via the miR-8485/GSK-3β/Wnt/β-catenin Signaling Axis.Current molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Effects of Parameter Combinations in Cervical Rotation-Traction Manipulation on Intervertebral Foramen Opening and Biomechanical Responses: A Finite Element Study.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Exploring the biomechanical mechanisms of cervical rotation manipulation in different lateral bending positions: a finite element analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Effect of interference electrotherapy combined with rotary traction manipulation on cervical function and recurrence in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Addressing Methodological and Generalizability Challenges in Cervical Rotation-Traction Manipulation (CRTM) for Cervical Radiculopathy [Letter].Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- A Commentary on "Cervical Rotation-Traction Manipulation for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials" [Letter].Journal of pain research · 2024Article
- A Commentary on "Cervical Rotation-Traction Manipulation for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials" [Letter].Journal of pain research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical radiculopathy (CR) is a common musculoskeletal disorder worldwide. Cervical rotation-traction manipulation (CRTM) is one of the representative technique in traditional Chinese orthopedics. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CRTM in treating CR. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted through eight databases to identify the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to December 2023. The primary outcome was the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes included Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), Cervical Range of Motion, cervical curvature, and adverse reactions and events. Two researchers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 15.0 software, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) system was used to assess the quality of the evidence. Results: A total of 9 RCTs involving 904 patients were included. The results indicated that CRTM significantly reduced VAS scores compared to control groups with low-quality evidence [ Conclusion: Cervical rotation-traction manipulation appears to be an effective and safe option for managing cervical radiculopathy, significantly improving pain and cervical mobility. However, further high-quality randomized controlled trials and methodological studies should be conducted to reinforce the evidence base for its clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.