Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39632584›Full record

ArticleJournal of microscopy2025

The photosensitive endoplasmic reticulum-chloroplast contact site.

Sara N Maynard, Lawrence R Griffing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sara N MaynardBiology Department and the Molecular and Environmental Plant Sciences Program, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Lawrence R GriffingBiology Department and the Molecular and Environmental Plant Sciences Program, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0706-2733

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) forms contact sites with the chloroplast. Exposing contact sites that contain both the chloroplast and the ER to localised high-fluence, wavelength specific, 405 nm violet light, hereinafter referred to as photostimulation, induces multiple, potentially interacting intra- and intercellular responses. The responses vary depending on the tissue type of the cell and the chloroplast. Photostimulating the ER-chloroplast contact sites in growing epidermal cells of the hypocotyl of Arabidopsis thaliana, produces a wave of cytoplasmic ionic calcium that traverses the cell, spreading radially to other cells around the circumference of the hypocotyl. A transient ER stress accompanies the calcium wave. These responses occur in older epidermal cells (5-8 days post-germination) with nonmotile chloroplasts tethered to the ER and the cell cortex but do not occur with motile or dividing chloroplasts. Dividing chloroplasts show a markedly different association with the ER, which forms a ring around the fission plane, similar to that of dividing mitochondria. Inhibition of calcium channels with lanthanum has no effect. Photostimulation of only the ER results in no ER stress and a calcium wave with a different spatiotemporal signature: delayed release and lower magnitude, with no accompanying ER stress response. Likewise, photostimulation of the chloroplast only, without the ER, produces no calcium wave or ER stress. General chloroplast photobleaching or restructuring caused by photostimulation is not the cause of this response; photostimulation with 488 nm of the same intensity and power as 405 nm photostimulation produces no change in cytosolic calcium levels. The pH of the ER decreases, indicating the involvement of ER ion transporters in the response. A wave of increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) in mitochondria and nuclei accompanies photostimulation. Together, these data support a model by which tethered ER-chloroplast contact sites constitute a unique subcellular photosensitive region and are part of an ER-mediated signalling network. Lay Abstract: The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) forms contact sites with the chloroplast. Shining violet (405 nm) light on the chloroplast with its associated ER produces a calcium wave through the cell that is communicated to other cells. This is correlated with a wave of transient denaturation of the luminal proteins of the ER (ER stress) and increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) in mitochondria. The wavelength dependence and precise cellular location of the light stimulation implies a novel way for plants to sense light. The movement of the response through the cell is consistent with the mediation of the response by a subcellular network, such as that formed by the ER.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisChloroplastsEndoplasmic ReticulumCalciumEndoplasmic Reticulum StressHypocotylLightCalciumcalcium waveendoplasmic reticulum pHendoplasmic reticulum stress responsenear‐UV photosensorreactive oxygen species wave

Identifiers

PMID39632584
PMCPMC11808455

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.