Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39632936›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Comparative chloroplast genomes analysis of nine Primulina (Gesneriaceae) rare species, from karst region of southwest China.

Jiangmiao Gu, Meijun Li, Songtao He, Zhi Li, Fang Wen, Ke Tan, Xinxiang Bai, Guoxiong Hu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of theMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiangmiao GuCollege of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China.
Meijun LiCollege of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China.
Songtao HeCollege of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China.
Zhi LiCollege of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China.
Fang WenGuangxi Key Laboratory of Plant Conservation and Restoration Ecology in Karst Terrain, Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guilin, 541006, China.
Ke TanGuangxi Key Laboratory of Plant Conservation and Restoration Ecology in Karst Terrain, Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guilin, 541006, China.
Xinxiang BaiCollege of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China. xxbai@gzu.edu.cn.
Guoxiong HuCollege of Life Sciences, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China.

Funding

Capacity-building project of SBR and CAS KFJ-BRP-017-68Key Science & Technology Research and Development Project of Guangxi Guike ZY21195050National Natural Science Foundation of China 32260782Natural Science Foundation of Guizhou Province Qiankehezhongyindi [2023] 029Special fund for innovation capacity construction of Guizhou research institution Qiankehefuqi [2024.013]
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guizhou Province is one of the most important karst regions of southwest China, with 22 Primulina species. These species are highly habitat-specialized and dependent on the soils of the karst region, and many inter-species classifications are unclear. Therefore, studying the chloroplast genomes and estimating the divergence times of there species can not only provide a better understanding of interspecific relationships but also help to know the species speciation and divergence in the karst environment. So, we sequenced and assembled the chloroplast genomes of nine Primulina species (including six endemic species of Guizhou) and conducted chloroplast genome comparison analysis and phylogenetic study. The chloroplast genome structures of the nine Primulina species were quadripartite with total lengths of 152,869-153,364 base pairs (bp) and GC content of 37.55-37.64%. There are 132 functional genes annotated, respectively. A total of 375 simple sequence repeats and 375 interspersed nuclear elements were identified. The 30 highly preferred codons identified were used at similar frequencies in different species, respectively. A phylogenetic tree constructed on the basis of the 38 chloroplast genomes showed that Primulina species form a monophyletic group. Eleven mutational hotspot regions that could serve as potential molecular markers were identified, of which two regions near the 3' and 5' ends of the ycf1 gene were of appropriate size and can serve as molecular markers for phylogenetic studies of Primulina. The results of molecular clock analyses indicate that the three major branches of Primulina begin to diverge in the Miocene, and the number of species proliferated in the Pliocene and Pleistocene. Most of the species of Primulina in Guizhou Province were formed in the Pleistocene and rapidly diverged within a short period of time. This research study enriches the genetic resource information of Primulina and deepens the understanding of the phylogenetic relationships of the genus.

Indexed as

Genome, ChloroplastPhylogenyBase CompositionChinaEvolution, MolecularMicrosatellite RepeatsChloroplast genomesComparative analysisKarstPhylogeneticPrimulina

Identifiers

PMID39632936
PMCPMC11618659

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.