Evidence mapPaperPMID 39633287Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Prediction of preterm birth using machine learning: a comprehensive analysis based on large-scale preschool children survey data in Shenzhen of China.

Liwen Ding, Xiaona Yin, Guomin Wen, Dengli Sun, Danxia Xian, Yafen Zhao, Maolin Zhang, Weikang Yang, Weiqing Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Antepartum prediction of shoulder dystocia using machine learning.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Liwen DingDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Xiaona YinWomen's and Children's Hospital of Longhua District of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518109, China.
Guomin WenWomen's and Children's Hospital of Longhua District of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518109, China.
Dengli SunWomen's and Children's Hospital of Longhua District of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518109, China.
Danxia XianWomen's and Children's Hospital of Longhua District of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518109, China.
Yafen ZhaoWomen's and Children's Hospital of Longhua District of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518109, China.
Maolin ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Weikang YangWomen's and Children's Hospital of Longhua District of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518109, China. yangweikang@lhfywork.com.
Weiqing ChenDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China. chenwq@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreterm birth (PTB) is a significant cause of neonatal mortality and long-term health issues. Accurate prediction and timely prevention of PTB are essential for reducing associated child mortality and morbidity. Traditional predictive methods face challenges due to heterogeneous risk factors and their interaction effects. This study aims to develop and evaluate six machine learning (ML) models to predict PTB using large-scale children survey data from Shenzhen, China, and to identify key predictors through Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis.

methodsData from 84,050 mother-child pairs, collected in 2021 and 2022, were processed and divided into training, validation, and test sets. Six ML models were tested: L1-Regularised Logistic Regression, Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Naive Bayes, Random Forests, Support Vector Machine, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). Model performance was evaluated based on discrimination, calibration and clinical utility. SHAP analysis was used to interpret the importance and impact of individual features on PTB prediction.

resultsThe XGBoost model demonstrated the best overall performance, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) scores of 0.752 and 0.757 in the validation and test sets, respectively, along with favorable calibration and clinical utility. Key predictors identified were multiple pregnancies, threatened abortion, and maternal age of conception. SHAP analysis highlighted the positive impacts of multiple pregnancies and threatened abortion, as well as the negative impact of micronutrient supplementation on PTB.

conclusionOur study found that ML models, particularly XGBoost, show promise in accurately predicting PTB and identifying key risk factors. These findings provide the potential of ML for enhancing clinical interventions, personalizing prenatal care, and informing public health initiatives.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPremature BirthAdultBayes TheoremChild, PreschoolChinaFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLogistic ModelsMalePregnancyRisk FactorsROC CurveSurveys and QuestionnairesMachine learningMultiple pregnanciesPrediction modelPreterm birthSHAPThreatened abortion

Identifiers

PMID39633287
PMCPMC11616287

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.