ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024
Prediction of preterm birth using machine learning: a comprehensive analysis based on large-scale preschool children survey data in Shenzhen of China.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for predicting and preventing adverse pregnancy outcomes addressing bias and clinical translation.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- A machine learning-based risk prediction model for early preterm birth: development and prospective validation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Antepartum prediction of shoulder dystocia using machine learning.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
- Predicting the risk of preterm birth with machine learning and electronic health records in China.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Interpretable machine learning model for predicting low birth weight in singleton pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence's Role in Improving Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Scoping Review and Consideration of Ethical Issues.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreterm birth (PTB) is a significant cause of neonatal mortality and long-term health issues. Accurate prediction and timely prevention of PTB are essential for reducing associated child mortality and morbidity. Traditional predictive methods face challenges due to heterogeneous risk factors and their interaction effects. This study aims to develop and evaluate six machine learning (ML) models to predict PTB using large-scale children survey data from Shenzhen, China, and to identify key predictors through Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis.
methodsData from 84,050 mother-child pairs, collected in 2021 and 2022, were processed and divided into training, validation, and test sets. Six ML models were tested: L1-Regularised Logistic Regression, Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Naive Bayes, Random Forests, Support Vector Machine, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). Model performance was evaluated based on discrimination, calibration and clinical utility. SHAP analysis was used to interpret the importance and impact of individual features on PTB prediction.
resultsThe XGBoost model demonstrated the best overall performance, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) scores of 0.752 and 0.757 in the validation and test sets, respectively, along with favorable calibration and clinical utility. Key predictors identified were multiple pregnancies, threatened abortion, and maternal age of conception. SHAP analysis highlighted the positive impacts of multiple pregnancies and threatened abortion, as well as the negative impact of micronutrient supplementation on PTB.
conclusionOur study found that ML models, particularly XGBoost, show promise in accurately predicting PTB and identifying key risk factors. These findings provide the potential of ML for enhancing clinical interventions, personalizing prenatal care, and informing public health initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.