ArticleGE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology2024
Deep Learning and Minimally Invasive Endoscopy: Panendoscopic Detection of Pleomorphic Lesions.
Article in GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-assisted versus conventional reading in pan-intestinal capsule endoscopy for suspected mid-lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Article
- A ubiquitous and interoperable deep learning model for automatic detection of pleomorphic gastroesophageal lesions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Capsule endoscopy (CE) is a minimally invasive exam suitable of panendoscopic evaluation of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Nevertheless, CE is time-consuming with suboptimal diagnostic yield in the upper GI tract. Convolutional neural networks (CNN) are human brain architecture-based models suitable for image analysis. However, there is no study about their role in capsule panendoscopy. Methods: Our group developed an artificial intelligence (AI) model for panendoscopic automatic detection of pleomorphic lesions (namely vascular lesions, protuberant lesions, hematic residues, ulcers, and erosions). 355,110 images (6,977 esophageal, 12,918 gastric, 258,443 small bowel, 76,772 colonic) from eight different CE and colon CE (CCE) devices were divided into a training and validation dataset in a patient split design. The model classification was compared to three CE experts' classification. The model's performance was evaluated by its sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the precision-recall curve. Results: The binary esophagus CNN had a diagnostic accuracy for pleomorphic lesions of 83.6%. The binary gastric CNN identified pleomorphic lesions with a 96.6% accuracy. The undenary small bowel CNN distinguished pleomorphic lesions with different hemorrhagic potentials with 97.6% accuracy. The trinary colonic CNN (detection and differentiation of normal mucosa, pleomorphic lesions, and hematic residues) had 94.9% global accuracy. Discussion/Conclusion: We developed the first AI model for panendoscopic automatic detection of pleomorphic lesions in both CE and CCE from multiple brands, solving a critical interoperability technological challenge. Deep learning-based tools may change the landscape of minimally invasive capsule panendoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.