ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
A clinical-radiomics nomogram based on multisequence MRI for predicting the outcome of patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving chemoradiotherapy.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in gastric cancer based on habitat imaging and peritumoral radiomics: a two-center study.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Problem: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a common malignant tumor with high heterogeneity and is mainly treated with chemoradiotherapy. It is important to predict the outcome of patients with advanced NPC after chemoradiotherapy to devise customized treatment strategies. Traditional MRI methods have limited predictive power, and better predictive models are needed. Aim: To evaluate the predictive value of a clinical-radiomics nomogram based on multisequence MRI in predicting the outcome of advanced NPC patients receiving chemoradiotherapy. Methods: This prospective study included a retrospective analysis of 118 patients with advanced NPC who underwent MRI prior to chemoradiotherapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The maximum ROIs of lesions at the same level were determined via axial T2-weighted imaging short-time inversion recovery (T2WI-STIR), contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with solid tumor components, and the radiomic features were extracted. After feature selection, the radiomics score was calculated, and a nomogram was constructed combining the radiomics score with the clinical features. The diagnostic efficacy of the model was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and the clinical application value of the nomogram was evaluated by decision curve analysis (DCA) and a correction curve. Patients were divided into a high-risk group and a low-risk group, and the median risk score calculated by the joint prediction model was used as the cutoff value. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to compare the differences in survival curves between the two groups. Results: The AUCs of the nomogram model constructed by the combination of the radiomics score and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and T stage in the training group and validation group were 0.897 (95% CI: 0.825-0.968) and 0.801 (95% CI: 0.673-0.929), respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that the model effectively stratified patients into high- and low-risk groups, with significant differences in prognosis. Conclusion: This clinical-radiomics nomogram based on multisequence MRI offers a noninvasive, effective tool for predicting the outcome of advanced NPC patients receiving chemoradiotherapy, promoting individualized treatment approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.