ArticleMethodsX2024
Literature trends and hidden patterns in health literacy studies among individuals with type 1 diabetes: A scoping review protocol.
Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health Literacy in People with Type 1 Diabetes: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rising prevalence and incidence of Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) highlights its impact on quality of life, long-term health complications, and the economic burden it poses across socio-economic strata. Effective management of T1D demands robust self-care skills, which are significantly influenced by health literacy (HL) levels; studies have shown that lower HL is associated with poorer health outcomes. This scoping review protocol is designed to identify literature trends and hidden patterns in research assessing HL among individuals with T1D. The review will consider studies that address HL in individuals with T1D across all age groups and settings. Studies published in English or those with an available HTML version will be included to allow automatic translation of the contents for non-English records. Guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines and the PRISMA-ScR 2020 framework, this scoping review will systematically search electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Web of Science (WoS) without time restrictions. Two independent reviewers will assess each study for eligibility and perform data extraction using a standardized form.•The review aims to map out the existing research landscape on HL in T1D and highlight areas requiring further investigation.•It seeks to establish connections between HL and self-care efficacy in T1D, contributing to improved patient education and management strategies.•Findings will inform future research directions and potentially influence policy and clinical practices surrounding diabetes care management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.