Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39635018›Full record

ArticleThe EPMA journal2024

Application of ChatGPT-4 to oculomics: a cost-effective osteoporosis risk assessment to enhance management as a proof-of-principles model in 3PM.

Joon Yul Choi, Eoksoo Han, Tae Keun Yoo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EPMA journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joon Yul ChoiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Yonsei University, Wonju, South Korea.
Eoksoo HanElectronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI), Daejeon, South Korea.
Tae Keun YooDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hangil Eye Hospital, 35 Bupyeong-Daero, Bupyeong-Gu, Incheon, 21388 South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0890-8614

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Oculomics is an emerging medical field that focuses on the study of the eye to detect and understand systemic diseases. ChatGPT-4 is a highly advanced AI model with multimodal capabilities, allowing it to process text and statistical data. Osteoporosis is a chronic condition presenting asymptomatically but leading to fractures if untreated. Current diagnostic methods like dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) are costly and involve radiation exposure. This study aims to develop a cost-effective osteoporosis risk prediction tool using ophthalmological data and ChatGPT-4 based on oculomics, aligning with predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine (3PM) principles. Working hypothesis and methods: We hypothesize that leveraging ophthalmological data (oculomics) combined with AI-driven regression models developed by ChatGPT-4 can significantly improve the predictive accuracy for osteoporosis risk. This integration will facilitate earlier detection, enable more effective preventive strategies, and support personalized treatment plans tailored to individual patients. We utilized DXA and ophthalmological data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to develop and validate osteopenia and osteoporosis prediction models. Ophthalmological and demographic data were integrated into logistic regression analyses, facilitated by ChatGPT-4, to create prediction formulas. These models were then converted into calculator software through automated coding by ChatGPT-4. Results: ChatGPT-4 automatically developed prediction models based on key predictors of osteoporosis and osteopenia included age, gender, weight, and specific ophthalmological conditions such as cataracts and early age-related macular degeneration, and successfully implemented a risk calculator tool. The oculomics-based models outperformed traditional methods, with area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic values of 0.785 for osteopenia and 0.866 for osteoporosis in the validation set. The calculator demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, providing a reliable tool for early osteoporosis screening. Conclusions and expert recommendations in the framework of 3PM: This study illustrates the value of integrating ophthalmological data into multi-level diagnostics for osteoporosis, significantly improving the accuracy of health risk assessment and the identification of at-risk individuals. Aligned with the principles of 3PM, this approach fosters earlier detection and enables the development of individualized patient profiles, facilitating personalized and targeted treatment strategies. This study also highlights the potential of AI, specifically ChatGPT-4, in developing accessible, cost-effective, and radiation-free screening tools for advancing 3PM in clinical practice. Our findings emphasize the importance of a holistic approach, incorporating comprehensive health indices and interdisciplinary collaboration, to deliver personalized management plans. Preventive strategies should focus on lifestyle modifications and targeted interventions to enhance bone health, thereby preventing the progression of osteoporosis and contributing to overall patient well-being. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13167-024-00378-0.

Indexed as

Advanced healthcareAIChatGPT-4Cost-effective holistic approachHealth risk assessmentIndividualized patient profileMulti-level diagnosticsOculomicsOphthalmologyOsteopeniaOsteoporosisPersonalized treatment strategiesPredictive preventive personalized medicine (PPPM / 3PM)Radiation-free screening tool

Identifiers

PMID39635018
PMCPMC11612069

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.