Evidence mapPaperPMID 39636074Full record

SynthesisDevelopmental psychobiology2025

Maternal Prenatal Stress and the Offspring Gut Microbiome: A Cross-Species Systematic Review.

Michelle D Graf, Nicolas Murgueitio, Sarah C Vogel, Lauren Hicks, Alexander L Carlson, Cathi B Propper, Mary Kimmel

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Developmental psychobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michelle D GrafSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6891-1220
Nicolas MurgueitioDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Sarah C VogelDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lauren HicksSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Alexander L CarlsonPediatric Physician Scientist Training Program, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Cathi B PropperSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9174-1263
Mary KimmelDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis., St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Funding

INTERVENTIONS FOR PREVENTING &MANAGING CHRONIC ILLNESST32NR007091 · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · 1996 to 2025
$3.1M
National Institute of HealthNINR NIH HHS T32 NR007091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prenatal period is a critical developmental juncture with enduring effects on offspring health trajectories. An individual's gut microbiome is associated with health and developmental outcomes across the lifespan. Prenatal stress can disrupt an infant's microbiome, thereby increasing susceptibility to adverse outcomes. This cross-species systematic review investigates whether maternal prenatal stress affects the offspring's gut microbiome. The study analyzes 19 empirical, peer-reviewed research articles, including humans, rodents, and non-human primates, that included prenatal stress as a primary independent variable and offspring gut microbiome characteristics as an outcome variable. Prenatal stress appeared to correlate with differences in beta diversity and specific microbial taxa, but not alpha diversity. Prenatal stress is positively correlated with Proteobacteria, Bacteroidaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Prevotellaceae, Bacteroides, and Serratia. Negative correlations were observed for Actinobacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, Streptococcaceae, Bifidobacteria, Eggerthella, Parabacteroides, and Streptococcus. Evidence for the direction of association between prenatal stress and Lactobacillus was mixed. The synthesis of findings was limited by differences in study design, operationalization and timing of prenatal stress, timing of infant microbiome sampling, and microbiome analysis methods.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomePrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsStress, PsychologicalAnimalsFemaleHumansPregnancyanimal modelsdisease susceptibilitygut microbiomeinfantmaternal–fetal relationsprenatal exposure delayed effectsstress

Identifiers

PMID39636074
PMCPMC12010507

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.