ReviewTechnology in cancer research & treatment
Narrative Review: Cardiotoxicities and Cardiac-Sparing Techniques in Radiotherapy.
Review in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation after thoracic radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- The Prone-Position Whole Breast Irradiation Paradox: Where Do We Stand? A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Comparison of proton and photon therapy in stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation for ventricular tachycardia.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- The impact of heart irradiation dose on cardiac injury and survival in lung cancer patients after radiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- An interdisciplinary approach to ensure adherence to exercise and potentially reduce adverse cardiac events in cancer patients: primers in cardio-oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review article aims to synthesize existing data on radiation-induced heart diseases in patients undergoing chest radiation therapy and also explores cardiac-sparing techniques to mitigate cardiotoxic effects. We conducted a comprehensive database search to review and consolidate data regarding chest radiotherapy and effects on the heart as well as techniques to minimize exposure to the heart. The research findings demonstrate associations between radiation exposure to cardiac substructures and subsequent cardiotoxicity. This review also stresses the importance of identifying patients at high-risk for cardiotoxicity as well as advocates for the adoption of stringent cardiac dose constraints in these patients. Advanced cardiac-sparing techniques, notably respiratory motion management, have emerged as pivotal strategies to minimize the likelihood of cardiac events. This narrative review emphasizes the critical role of these innovations in optimizing cardiac health during radiation treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.