ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2025
Reappraisal of soft tissue myoepithelial tumors by DNA methylation profiling reveals an epigenetically distinct group of mostly fusion-driven neoplasms.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- FET-Rearranged Myoepithelial Tumors Are Clinically Heterogeneous and Epigenetically Distinct from PLAG1-Rearranged Adnexal and Salivary Gland Myoepithelial Tumors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soft tissue myoepithelial tumors (METs) are diagnostically challenging tumors that require careful histologic and immunohistochemical characterization for accurate classification. Nearly half of METs show recurrent EWSR1 or FUS gene rearrangements with a diverse set of fusion partners. The diversity of fusion partners and lack of known driver abnormalities in many cases raises the question of whether METs represent a uniformly distinct tumor entity. To address this question, we performed careful histopathologic and molecular analysis, including DNA methylation profiling (DNA-MP) and fusion testing, on a cohort of 30 institutionally diagnosed METs from 29 patients. On histologic and immunophenotypic evaluation, 22 of 30 tumors diagnosed as MET fulfilled strict histologic and immunophenotypic criteria. Among those failing to meet criteria, most were reclassified as another tumor entity by DNA-MP. Seven tumors meeting criteria grouped with another sarcoma reference type by DNA-MP, with confirmation of the characteristic driver abnormality of that tumor in selected cases. The remaining tumors histologically "consistent" with METs (n = 15) formed a distinct epigenetic cluster, independent of other reference entities. Recurrent gene fusions were identified in 11 of 15 tumors in this epigenetically distinct group, including EWSR1::KLF15 (n = 4), EWSR1::PBX3 (n = 2), and EWSR1::POU5F1 (n = 1) rearrangements. Clinicopathologic correlation suggests that EWSR1::KLF15 tumors are enriched in pediatric patients with aggressive histology. Our work shows that at least a subset of METs falls within an epigenetically distinct but heterogenous group. Furthermore, DNA-MP provides a useful adjunct to other molecular testing to help distinguish METs from histologic mimics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.