ArticlePloS one2024
Social support and symptoms of antenatal depression among women screened for gestational diabetes mellitus: A cross-sectional study in Northern Vietnam (the VALID II study).
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring pregnant women's experiences of a digital self-care intervention for gestational diabetes mellitus in Vietnam: a qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study from Northern Vietnam aims to assess the association between social support and symptoms of depression among pregnant women screened for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 823 pregnant women in Thai Binh, Vietnam. The women were screened for GDM and structured questionnaire were used to collect data on social support factors, GDM factors, and symptoms of depression. The diagnosis of GDM was based on the 2-hour 75-g OGTT according to WHO 2013 criteria. The Edinburg Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) with a cut-off of 10 and the Multidimensional Perceived Social Support Scale (MSPSS) were used to assess depression symptoms and perceived social support, respectively. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to measure the associations between social support, GDM-related factors, and symptoms of depression. The relationship between social support score and symptoms of depression was evaluated using Spearman's correlation. The strength of the associations were measured by adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
resultsThe prevalence rates of GDM and symptoms of depression were 22.2% (95%CI: 19.4-25.2) and 23.0% (95%CI: 20.1-26.0), respectively. Women who had moved away from their commune of birth and women who reported another person than their husband to be the primary person to confide in had increased odds of depression (aOR = 1.74; 95%CI:1.19-2.56 and aOR = 2.36; 95%CI:1.48-3.75, respectively). A reported lack of social support was strongly associated with increased odds of depression symptoms among both women with gestational diabetes mellitus (aOR = 6.16, 95% CI:2.35-16.12) and without gestational diabetes mellitus (aOR = 2.81; 95%CI: 1.67-4.75). When analysing the correlation between social support and depression symptoms, a negative correlation was found, with decreasing depression scores as the social support score increased.
conclusionThe prevalence of symptoms of depression was high in our study, and women in Northern Vietnam who feel well-supported socially are less likely to report symptoms of depression. This finding applies both to women with and without GDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.