ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2025
A multimodal Neuroimaging-Based risk score for mild cognitive impairment.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuroimaging Summary Scores Predict Trajectories of Psychotic-Like Experiences in Youth.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Observational
- Multi-Index Brain Function-Cognition Correlation in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Resting-State fMRI Study.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementiasArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAlzheimer's disease (AD), the most prevalent age-related dementia, leads to significant cognitive decline. While genetic risk factors and neuroimaging biomarkers have been extensively studied, establishing a neuroimaging-based metric to assess AD risk has received less attention. This study introduces the Brain-wide Risk Score (BRS), a novel approach using multimodal neuroimaging data to assess the risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a precursor to AD.
methodsParticipants from the OASIS-3 cohort (N = 1,389) were categorized into control (CN) and MCI groups. Structural MRI (sMRI) data provided gray matter (GM) segmentation maps, while resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) data yielded functional network connectivity (FNC) matrices via spatially constrained independent component analysis. Similar imaging features were computed from the UK Biobank (N = 37,780). The BRS was calculated by comparing each participant's neuroimaging features to the difference between average features of CN and MCI groups. Both GM and FNC features were used. The BRS effectively differentiated CN from MCI individuals within OASIS-3 and in an independent dataset from the ADNI cohort (N = 729), demonstrating its ability to identify MCI risk.
resultsUnimodal analysis revealed that sMRI provided greater differentiation than fMRI, consistent with prior research. Using the multimodal BRS, we identified two distinct groups: one with high MCI risk (negative GM and FNC BRS) and another with low MCI risk (positive GM and FNC BRS). Additionally, 46 UK Biobank participants diagnosed with AD showed FNC and GM patterns similar to the high-risk groups.
conclusionValidation using the ADNI dataset confirmed our results, highlighting the potential of FNC and sMRI-based BRS in early Alzheimer's detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.