Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39637833›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Patient reported experiences and readmissions for people with diabetes-related foot disease admitted to public hospitals, New South Wales, Australia, 2019-2022.

Alexander C R Burnett, Jennifer Williamson, Aedan G K Roberts, Sadaf Marashi-Pour, Liz Hay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexander C R BurnettCentre for Epidemiology and Evidence, New South Wales Department of Health, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8313-7883
Jennifer WilliamsonEconomics and Evaluation Unit, Strategic Reform and Planning, New South Wales Department of Health, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
Aedan G K RobertsEconomics and Evaluation Unit, Strategic Reform and Planning, New South Wales Department of Health, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6429-6133
Sadaf Marashi-PourBureau of Health Information, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3067-4095
Liz HayEconomics and Evaluation Unit, Strategic Reform and Planning, New South Wales Department of Health, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePatient reported measures of hospital care are known predictors of readmission, even after accounting for risk related to age and comorbidities. This study aimed to determine the association between patient experience of diabetes-related foot disease (DFD) hospital care and unplanned hospital readmission, with a primary focus on DFD-related readmissions and a secondary focus on all-cause readmissions.

methodsA retrospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted by linking NSW Adult Admitted Patient Survey data with administrative hospital data for persons hospitalised with DFD identified through diagnostic and/or procedure codes. Univariable and multivariable shared-frailty Cox regression models were used to examine the association between key aspects of patient experiences and 90-days unplanned hospital readmission over the period 2019-2022.

resultsOverall, 3,173 DFD patients were included. Ninety-day readmission rates for respondents with DFD were 9% for DFD-related readmissions and 16% for all-cause readmissions. Adults with DFD who could not understand explanations offered by health professionals were at increased risk of DFD-related readmission compared to those who could always understand (Hazard ratio (HR) 2.43, CI: 1.47-4.00), as well as patients who did not feel well enough to leave hospital at discharge (HR 1.93, CI: 1.41-2.64) or reported the care received was not well organised (HR 2.24, 1.45-3.47). Patients reporting that they did not receive enough information regarding their condition, treatment, or how to manage care at home were found to have a DFD-related readmission risk that was 1.5 to 1.8-times greater than those who did. Similar patterns were observed for all-cause readmissions, albeit with generally smaller effect sizes.

conclusionsThe findings highlight that elements of care related to communication, coordination, and involvement in decision making may influence unplanned readmission rates for patients with chronic conditions, such as DFD. The impact appears to be more pronounced for DFD-related readmissions compared to all-cause readmissions.

Indexed as

Diabetic FootHospitals, PublicPatient ReadmissionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHospitalizationHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNew South WalesPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39637833
PMCPMC11620797

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.