ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2025
Exploring dietitians' experiences caring for patients living with obesity in acute care: a qualitative study.
Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- How does the Calibre learning program impact attitudes towards caring for patients who have obesity?Obesity pillars · 2026Article
- Addressing Malnutrition in Australian Hospitals: A Scoping Review to Inform Systems Thinking.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026Article
- Review
- Understanding Primary Care Dietitians' Experiences and Perspectives on Weight Management Practice Using the COM-B Model.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObesity is a modifiable risk factor associated with hospital-associated complications. Recent studies show there is a high prevalence of patients with obesity presenting to hospital and evidence indicates that people living with obesity should receive diet advice from a dietitian; however, patients often do not receive this care in acute settings.
aimThe primary aim of this study was to explore the experiences of dietitians caring for patients living with obesity in acute hospital settings.
methodsA multi-site qualitative study was conducted from October 2021 to November 2023 in Melbourne, Australia. Constructivist grounded theory methodology informed sampling and data collection. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with dietitians working in acute care. Data were analysed using open coding and constant comparison underpinned by Charmaz's framework.
resultsInterviews were conducted with 25 dietitians working across four hospitals. The theory developed from the data describes an enculturated decision-making process whereby acute clinical dietitians are limiting acute nutrition care for people living with obesity in hospital. The theory includes five interdependent categories that influence clinical decision-making and practice: (1) culture of professional practice, (2) science and evidence, (3) acknowledgement of weight bias and stigma, (4) dietitian-led care and (5) hospital systems and environment.
conclusionThe findings from this study provide new insights as to why dietitians may not be providing acute nutrition care for people living with obesity. Strategic leadership from clinical leaders and education providers together with the lived experience perspectives of people with obesity is needed to shift the culture of dietetic professional practice to consider all nutrition care needs of patients living with obesity who are accessing acute hospitals for health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.