ArticleLab animal2025
Timing of standard chow exposure determines the variability of mouse phenotypic outcomes and gut microbiota profile.
Article in Lab animal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mouse models to study von Willebrand factor in inflammation: a scoping review.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Review
- Microbiota-accessible carbohydrates enhance gut microbiota stability and antibiotic resilience through production of quorum sensing molecule AI-2.Gut microbes reports · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Standard chow diets influence reproducibility in animal model experiments because chows have different nutrient compositions, which can independently influence phenotypes. However, there is little evidence of the role of timing in the extent of variability caused by chow exposure. Here we measured the impact of different diets (5V5M, 5V0G, 2920X and 5058) and timing of exposure (adult exposure (AE), lifetime exposure (LE) and developmental exposure (DE)) on growth and development, metabolic health indicators and gut bacterial microbiota profiles across genetically identical C57BL/6J mice. Diet drove differences in macro- and micronutrient intake for all exposure models. AE had no effect on phenotypic outcomes. However, LE mice exhibited significant sex-dependent diet effects on growth, body weight and body composition. LE effects were mostly absent in the DE model, where mice were exposed to chow differences only from conception to weaning. Both AE and LE models exhibited similar diet-driven beta diversity profiles for the gut bacterial microbiota, with 5058 diet driving the most distinct profile. However, compared with AE, LE effects on beta diversity were sex dependent, and LE mice exhibited nine times more differentially abundant bacterial genera, the majority of which were inversely affected by 2920X and 5058 diets. Our findings demonstrate that LE to different chow diets has the greatest impact on the reproducibility of several experimental measures commonly used in preclinical mouse model studies. Importantly, weaning mice from different diets onto the same diet for maturation may be an effective way to reduce unwanted phenotypic variability among experimental models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.