ReviewBiology of sex differences2024
X-inactive-specific transcript: a long noncoding RNA with a complex role in sex differences in human disease.
Review in Biology of sex differences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular disease in women: traditional and sex-specific risk factors.European heart journal · 2026Review
- Chromosomal and hormonal factors involved in human sexual dimorphism.Endocrine journal · 2026Review
- Determining gene specificity from multivariate single-cell RNA sequencing data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Sex differences in pulmonary (arterial) hypertension: does it matter?Current opinion in pulmonary medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In humans, the X and Y chromosomes determine the biological sex, XX specifying for females and XY for males. The long noncoding RNA X-inactive specific transcript (lncRNA XIST) plays a crucial role in the process of X chromosome inactivation (XCI) in cells of the female, a process that ensures the balanced expression of X-linked genes between sexes. Initially, it was believed that XIST can be expressed only from the inactive X chromosome (Xi) and is considered a typically female-specific transcript. However, accumulating evidence suggests that XIST can be detected in male cells as well, and it participates in the development of cancers and other human diseases by regulating gene expression at epigenetic, chromatin remodeling, transcriptional, and translational levels. XIST is abnormally expressed in many sexually dimorphic diseases, including autoimmune and neurological diseases, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), and some types of cancers. However, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Escape from XCI and skewed XCI also contributes to sex-biased diseases and their severity. Interestingly, in humans, similar to experimental animal models of human disease, the males with the XIST gene activated display the sex-biased disease condition at a rate close to females, and significantly greater than males who had not been genetically modified. For instance, the men with supernumerary X chromosomes, such as men with Klinefelter syndrome (47, XXY), are predisposed toward autoimmunity similar to females (46, XX), and have increased risk for strongly female biased diseases, compared to 46, XY males. Interestingly, chromosome X content has been linked to a longer life span, and the presence of two chromosome X contributes to increased longevity regardless of the hormonal status. In this review, we summarize recent knowledge about XIST structure/function correlation and involvement in human disease with focus on XIST abnormal expression in males. Many human diseases show differences between males and females in penetrance, presentation, progression, and survival. In humans, the X and Y sex chromosomes determine the biological sex, XX specifying for females and XY for males. This numeric imbalance, two X chromosomes in females and only one in males, known as sex chromosome dosage inequality, is corrected in the first days of embryonic development by inactivating one of the X chromosomes in females. While this "dosage compensation" should in theory solve the difference in the number of genes between sexes, the expressed doses of X genes are incompletely compensated by X chromosome inactivation in females. In this review we try to highlight how abnormal expression and function of XIST, a gene on the X chromosome responsible for this inactivation process, may explain the sex differences in human health and disease. A better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of XIST participation in the male-female differences in disease is highly relevant since it would allow for improving the personalization of diagnosis and sex-specific treatment of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.