Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39639401›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2024

A-I-D for cascades: an application of the Behaviour Change Wheel to design a theory-based intervention for addressing prescribing cascades in primary care.

Lisa M McCarthy, Barbara J Farrell, Colleen Metge, Lianne Jeffs, Sameera Toenjes, M Christine Rodriguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Real-World Complexity of Prescribing Cascades.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lisa M McCarthyLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. lisa.mccarthy@utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9087-1077
Barbara J FarrellBruyère Health Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2388-5353
Colleen MetgeLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9170-3294
Lianne JeffsScience of Care Institute and Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3522-2549
Sameera ToenjesLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1802-9660
M Christine RodriguezLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9524-0300

Funding

Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto Clinical, Social and Administrative Pharmacy Research Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrescribing cascades, which occur when a medication is used to treat the side effect of another medication, are important contributors to polypharmacy. There is an absence of studies that evaluate interventions to address them. We describe an application of the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) to design theory-informed interventions for addressing prescribing cascades within interprofessional primary care teams.

methodsThe BCW framework was applied to guide intervention development. This report describes the first seven steps. Three behaviours were developed based on data collected from two qualitative studies exploring why and how cascades occur across practice settings. A target behaviour was selected and the COM-B model was applied to identify relevant factors for interprofessional primary care teams. Relevant intervention types, policy options, and corresponding behaviour change techniques (BCTs) were identified, and intervention examples drafted. Prioritization of behaviours and intervention examples were guided by the APEASE criteria.

resultsThe three behaviours involved supporting: (1) healthcare providers (HCPs) to ask about, investigate and manage cascades, (2) the public to ask about prescribing cascades, and (3) the public to share medication histories and experiences with HCPs. The team selected the HCP behaviour, A-I-D (ask, investigate, deprescribe), for intervention development. Psychological capability and physical opportunity were the most relevant COM-B components. Ten intervention options comprised of BCTs were developed, which are ready for further prioritization by stakeholders. These can be grouped into: provision of educational materials for use by HCPs; provision of consultation or training to support HCPs; and knowledge mobilization strategies. Through the process, the team identified that development of a practice guidance tool, which assists HCPs to investigate and manage prescribing cascades, is needed to support further intervention development.

conclusionsThe BCW framework guided the design of intervention examples to support primary HCPs practicing in interprofessional teams to address prescribing cascades. When identifying interventions for future consultation, creation of a practice guidance tool was prioritized as it underpins all proposed interventions for addressing prescribing cascades in practice. Further research is needed to determine what primary HCPs would need in this practice guidance tool and how it will be used in practice, to support its development.

Indexed as

Behaviour changeDeprescribingDrugPolypharmacyPrescribing cascadesSide effects

Identifiers

PMID39639401
PMCPMC11619126

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.