ReviewBiomarker research2024
Microfluidic biosensors for biomarker detection in body fluids: a key approach for early cancer diagnosis.
Review in Biomarker research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sensitive detection of unopposed estrogen using estrogen receptor functionalized nanoprobes for cancer diagnosis.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Capillary-Driven Microfluidic Electrical Screening of Influenza H3N2-Infected A549 Cells Using AgNP-Decorated Laser-Patterned Villous Microstructures.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Nanozyme-Driven Signal Amplification in Cancer Biosensing: Innovations Toward Precision and Point-of-Care Oncology.Micromachines · 2026Review
- AI-Assisted Molecular Biosensors: Design Strategies for Wearable and Real-Time Monitoring.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Cell-Based Immuno-Biosensors Using Microfluidics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Electrochemical and optical biosensors for periodontitis detection.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Review
- Smart microfluidic devices integrated in electrochemical point-of-care platforms for biomarker detection in biological fluids.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Next-Generation Diagnostic Technologies for Dengue Virus Detection: Microfluidics, Biosensing, CRISPR, and AI Approaches.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Developing point-of-need (PON) cancer biosensors using microfluidic paper-based analytical devices: recent advances.RSC advances · 2025Review
- A 3D-printed handheld microfluidic device for sensitive and low-cost on-site immunodetection.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Article
- Emerging technologies and clinical translation of urine-based liquid biopsy in urological cancers.Genes & genomics · 2025Review
- Cancer and Aging Biomarkers: Classification, Early Detection Technologies and Emerging Research Trends.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Camptothecin in Cancer Therapy: Current Challenges and Emerging Strategies with Nanoemulsions.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Enhancing Microparticle Separation Efficiency in Acoustofluidic Chips via Machine Learning and Numerical Modeling.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Point-of-Care Testing and Biomarkers in Biliary Diseases: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- 4D-printed microdevices for spatiotemporal detection of ctDNA and miRNA in pancreatic cancer: an in-depth review.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Sophisticated Interfaces Between Biosensors and Organoids: Advancing Towards Intelligent Multimodal Monitoring Physiological Parameters.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Compact All-Fiber SERS Probe Sensor Based on the MMF-NCF Structure with Self-Assembled Gold Nanoparticles.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Emerging biomarkers for early cancer detection and diagnosis: challenges, innovations, and clinical perspectives.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Socioeconomic impact of artificial intelligence-driven point-of-care testing devices for liquid biopsy in the OncoCheck system.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early detection of cancer significantly improves patient outcomes, with biomarkers offering a promising avenue for earlier and more precise diagnoses. Microfluidic biosensors have emerged as a powerful tool for detecting these biomarkers in body fluids, providing enhanced sensitivity, specificity, and rapid analysis. This review focuses on recent advances in microfluidic biosensors from 2018 to 2024, detailing their operational principles, fabrication techniques, and integration with nanotechnology for cancer biomarker detection. Additionally, we have reviewed recent innovations in several aspects of microfluidic biosensors, such as novel detection technologies, nanomaterials and novel microfluidic chip structures, which significantly enhance detection capabilities. We highlight key biomarkers pertinent to early cancer detection and explore how these innovations in biosensor technology contribute to the evolving landscape of personalized medicine. We further explore how these technologies could be incorporated into clinical cancer diagnostic workflows to improve early detection and treatment outcomes. These innovations could help enable more precise and personalized cancer diagnostics. In addition, this review addresses several important issues such as enhancing the scalability and sensitivity of these biosensors in clinical settings and points out future possibilities of combining artificial intelligence diagnostics with microfluidic biosensors to optimize their practical applications. This overview aims to guide future research and clinical applications by addressing current challenges and identifying opportunities for further development in the field of biomarker research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.