Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39640154›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

The Psychology Behind the Efficacy of a Buddy System for Enhancing Retention in Dermatological Clinical Trials.

Kelly M Frasier, Grace Herrick, Hiral Patel, Sriya Kakarla, Lana Danial, Sri Vaishnavi Konagalla, Niralee Patel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kelly M FrasierDermatology, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, USA.
Grace HerrickDermatology, Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dothan, USA.
Hiral PatelDermatology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, USA.
Sriya KakarlaDermatology, University of Texas Health Houston McGovern Medical School, Houston, USA.
Lana DanialDermatology, Andrew Taylor Still University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Mesa, USA.
Sri Vaishnavi KonagallaDermatology, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Niralee PatelDermatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retention in dermatological clinical trials is critical for ensuring the validity and reliability of study outcomes, yet participant dropout remains a pervasive challenge. In this analysis, the primary aim is to explore the psychological mechanisms underpinning the efficacy of a buddy system in enhancing retention rates in such trials. The buddy system, where participants are paired with peers who have previously participated in similar clinical trials offers mutual support and leverages the principles of social bonding, accountability, and shared experience to foster commitment and reduce attrition. The novelty of this approach lies in its focus on the psychological and emotional dimensions of trial participation, rather than solely on logistical or incentive-based strategies. Implementing a buddy system draws on theories of social support and motivation, suggesting that the presence of a buddy can alleviate anxiety, increase perceived value, and enhance the overall clinical trial experience. Future research should investigate the long-term effects of buddy systems across diverse demographic groups and dermatological conditions, as well as potential adaptations for virtual trial settings. In conclusion, integrating a buddy system into dermatological clinical trials represents an innovative strategy that could significantly improve retention, thereby strengthening the robustness of clinical data and advancing dermatological research.

Indexed as

academic dermatologybuddy systemclinical researcherclinical trials in all phases (i-iv)psychosocial impact

Identifiers

PMID39640154
PMCPMC11617496

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.