ReviewCureus2024
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Teriparatide Versus Alendronate in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cost Effectiveness of Teriparatide for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review.Clinical drug investigation · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- The N-butanol extract of modified Yanghe decoction alleviates ferroptosis in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis by activating the HIF-1α/GPX4 signaling pathway.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Osteoporosis: Relevance of Biomolecules for Diagnosis and Treatment.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Effects of dietary supplements on bone turnover markers in women after menopause: a network meta-analysis.PeerJ · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alendronate, a second-generation bisphosphonate, remains the first-line therapeutic option for postmenopausal osteoporosis. It acts on the bone resorbing osteoclasts causing their apoptosis. This is achieved by producing toxic adenosine triphosphate (ATP) analogues and interfering with the mevalonate pathway. Teriparatide, a recombinant form of parathyroid hormone, is an alternative option to this more conventional drug. It is an anabolic drug that mediates its biological effect via specific, high-affinity membrane cell-surface receptors expressed on the osteoblasts. It promotes bone formation more than bone resorption. Hence, this research was conducted to delineate the effectiveness and clinical safety of teriparatide as compared to alendronate in women suffering from postmenopausal osteoporosis. An extensive search was conducted through PubMed, Google Scholar, Trip (Turning Research into Practice), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) including studies published between August 2017 and October 2024 in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines 2020. The Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and Boolean operators used were "Alendronate" OR "Diphosphonates" OR "Teriparatide" OR "Treatment Outcome" OR "Postmenopause" AND "Osteoporosis". Randomized controlled trials were included in this systematic review. Five full-text articles were ultimately considered and critical appraisal was performed thereon. The annual incidence rate of morphometric vertebral fracture in the sequential therapy (teriparatide) group (0.1020 and 0.1334) was significantly lower than monotherapy (alendronate) (0.1492 and 0.1734). Quality of life (QoL) by week 12 was better in teriparatide than alendronate and no patient encountered any severe adverse effects with teriparatide after 72 weeks of treatment. Thus, based on the results, teriparatide is more effective than alendronate in increasing the bone mineral density (BMD) of L2-4 vertebrae and the hip bone. However, alendronate is better in the case of femoral neck fractures. Furthermore, spinal strength shows a better response in the trabecular than peripheral compartment with teriparatide. Teriparatide is also safer than alendronate due to its lower incidence rate in morphometric vertebral fracture, lack of severe adverse effects and better QoL. Teriparatide showed comparable inhibition of vertebral collapse, increase in BMD, promotion of bone union, and improvement of pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.