ArticleSurgical neurology international2024
Neurocircle microsurgery model: Description of simulation-based training and exoscope.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Microsurgery is crucial in neurosurgery, requiring precise skills for interventions on delicate structures. Effective training is essential for developing these skills. In Peru and Latin America, however, there is a notable shortage of specialized training centers and high costs associated with foreign simulators, hindering the development of neurosurgical skills. To address this issue, the NeuroZone3D Research Center has initiated a project to create a national dataset on Peruvian craniometry and develop locally adapted training models. Methods: The "NeuroCircle Microsurgery Model" was created through a multi-phase process. Phase 1 involved designing a simulation platform using a 3D printer. Phase 2 focused on creating a realistic biomodel with polyurethane and advanced modeling techniques. In Phase 3, the biomodel was assembled and integrated into the platform. Phase 4 included using a wooden module, a cost-effective exoscope simulation, and surgical instruments to provide a realistic training environment. Results: The "NeuroCircle Microsurgery Model" provided a stable and effective training environment. Feedback from training sessions with neurosurgery residents and medical students indicated significant improvements in microsurgical skills. Participants valued the model's realism and its role in enhancing their surgical proficiency. Conclusion: The "NeuroCircle Microsurgery Model" is a significant advancement in microsurgery training for Peru and Latin America. Its development provides a valuable, locally adaptable tool for improving surgical skills and addresses the critical training gaps in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.