Evidence mapPaperPMID 39640362Full record

ReviewMedComm2024

The role and mechanism of NAT10-mediated ac4C modification in tumor development and progression.

Zhuoran Gu, Libin Zou, Xinjian Pan, Yang Yu, Yongqiang Liu, Zhijin Zhang, Ji Liu, Shiyu Mao, Junfeng Zhang, Changcheng Guo and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in MedComm, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. NAT10/acProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. WDR5-H3K4me3 Epigenetic Axis Promotes TRMT6-Dependent tRNA MAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Zhuoran GuDepartment of Urology Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital School of Medicine Tongji University Shanghai China.
Libin ZouDepartment of Urology Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital School of Medicine Tongji University Shanghai China.
Xinjian PanDepartment of Urology Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital School of Medicine Tongji University Shanghai China.
Yang YuDepartment of Urology Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital School of Medicine Tongji University Shanghai China.
Yongqiang LiuDepartment of Urology Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital School of Medicine Tongji University Shanghai China.
Zhijin ZhangDepartment of Urology Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital School of Medicine Tongji University Shanghai China.
Ji LiuDepartment of Urology Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital School of Medicine Tongji University Shanghai China.
Shiyu MaoDepartment of Urology Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital School of Medicine Tongji University Shanghai China.
Junfeng ZhangDepartment of Urology Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital School of Medicine Tongji University Shanghai China.
Changcheng GuoDepartment of Urology Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital School of Medicine Tongji University Shanghai China.
Wei LiDepartment of Urology Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital School of Medicine Tongji University Shanghai China.
Jiang GengDepartment of Urology Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital School of Medicine Tongji University Shanghai China.
Wentao ZhangDepartment of Urology Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital School of Medicine Tongji University Shanghai China.
Xudong YaoDepartment of Urology Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital School of Medicine Tongji University Shanghai China.
Bing ShenDepartment of Urology Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital School of Medicine Tongji University Shanghai China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0952-2257

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA modification has emerged as a crucial area of research in epigenetics, significantly influencing tumor biology by regulating RNA metabolism. N-acetyltransferase 10 (NAT10)-mediated N4-acetylcytidine (ac4C) modification, the sole known acetylation in eukaryotic RNA, influences cancer pathogenesis and progression. NAT10 is the only writer of ac4C and catalyzes acetyl transfer on targeted RNA, and ac4C helps to improve the stability and translational efficiency of ac4C-modified RNA. NAT10 is highly expressed and associated with poor prognosis in pan-cancers. Based on its molecular mechanism and biological functions, ac4C is a central factor in tumorigenesis, tumor progression, drug resistance, and tumor immune escape. Despite the increasing focus on ac4C, the specific regulatory mechanisms of ac4C in cancer remain elusive. The present review thoroughly analyzes the current knowledge on NAT10-mediated ac4C modification in cancer, highlighting its broad regulatory influence on targeted gene expression and tumor biology. This review also summarizes the limitations and perspectives of current research on NAT10 and ac4C in cancer, to identify new therapeutic targets and advance cancer treatment strategies.

Indexed as

cancerepitranscriptomeN4‐acetylation (ac4C)N‐acetyltransferase 10 (NAT10)RNA modification

Identifiers

PMID39640362
PMCPMC11617596

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.