Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39640721›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Comprehensive analysis of computational approaches in plant transcription factors binding regions discovery.

Jyoti, Ritu, Sagar Gupta, Ravi Shankar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

JyotiStudio of Computational Biology & Bioinformatics, The Himalayan Centre for High-throughput Computational Biology, (HiCHiCoB, A BIC Supported by DBT, India), Biotechnology Division, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology (CSIR-IHBT), Palampur, (HP), 176061, India.
RituStudio of Computational Biology & Bioinformatics, The Himalayan Centre for High-throughput Computational Biology, (HiCHiCoB, A BIC Supported by DBT, India), Biotechnology Division, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology (CSIR-IHBT), Palampur, (HP), 176061, India.
Sagar GuptaStudio of Computational Biology & Bioinformatics, The Himalayan Centre for High-throughput Computational Biology, (HiCHiCoB, A BIC Supported by DBT, India), Biotechnology Division, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology (CSIR-IHBT), Palampur, (HP), 176061, India.
Ravi ShankarStudio of Computational Biology & Bioinformatics, The Himalayan Centre for High-throughput Computational Biology, (HiCHiCoB, A BIC Supported by DBT, India), Biotechnology Division, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology (CSIR-IHBT), Palampur, (HP), 176061, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription factors (TFs) are regulatory proteins which bind to a specific DNA region known as the transcription factor binding regions (TFBRs) to regulate the rate of transcription process. The identification of TFBRs has been made possible by a number of experimental and computational techniques established during the past few years. The process of TFBR identification involves peak identification in the binding data, followed by the identification of motif characteristics. Using the same binding data attempts have been made to raise computational models to identify such binding regions which could save time and resources spent for binding experiments. These computational approaches depend a lot on what way they learn and how. These existing computational approaches are skewed heavily around human TFBRs discovery, while plants have drastically different genomic setup for regulation which these approaches have grossly ignored. Here, we provide a comprehensive study of the current state of the matters in plant specific TF discovery algorithms. While doing so, we encountered several software tools' issues rendering the tools not useable to researches. We fixed them and have also provided the corrected scripts for such tools. We expect this study to serve as a guide for better understanding of software tools' approaches for plant specific TFBRs discovery and the care to be taken while applying them, especially during cross-species applications. The corrected scripts of these software tools are made available at https://github.com/SCBB-LAB/Comparative-analysis-of-plant-TFBS-software.

Indexed as

Deep learningMachine learningTF-DNA binding specificityTranscription factor binding regionsTranscription factors

Identifiers

PMID39640721
PMCPMC11620080

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.