ArticleHeliyon2024
Comprehensive analysis of computational approaches in plant transcription factors binding regions discovery.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The mirage of DNA methylation in transcriptional regulation of plants.The plant genome · 2026Review
- From binding to networks: methods for identifying transcription factor targets in plant systems.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- VIP-OT: Dissecting Single-Cell Biochemical State Dynamics under Perturbation via Vibrational Painting and Optimal Transport.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- PTF-Vāc: An explainable and generative deep co-learning encoder-decoder system for ab initio discovery of plant transcription factor binding sites.Plant communications · 2025Article
- DMRU: generative deep learning to unravel condition-specific cytosine methylation in plants.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcription factors (TFs) are regulatory proteins which bind to a specific DNA region known as the transcription factor binding regions (TFBRs) to regulate the rate of transcription process. The identification of TFBRs has been made possible by a number of experimental and computational techniques established during the past few years. The process of TFBR identification involves peak identification in the binding data, followed by the identification of motif characteristics. Using the same binding data attempts have been made to raise computational models to identify such binding regions which could save time and resources spent for binding experiments. These computational approaches depend a lot on what way they learn and how. These existing computational approaches are skewed heavily around human TFBRs discovery, while plants have drastically different genomic setup for regulation which these approaches have grossly ignored. Here, we provide a comprehensive study of the current state of the matters in plant specific TF discovery algorithms. While doing so, we encountered several software tools' issues rendering the tools not useable to researches. We fixed them and have also provided the corrected scripts for such tools. We expect this study to serve as a guide for better understanding of software tools' approaches for plant specific TFBRs discovery and the care to be taken while applying them, especially during cross-species applications. The corrected scripts of these software tools are made available at https://github.com/SCBB-LAB/Comparative-analysis-of-plant-TFBS-software.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.