Evidence mapPaperPMID 39641749Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2024

Unpicking Causal Relationships Between Grip Strength and Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study.

Tom Norris, Rachel Cooper, Victoria Garfield, Mark Hamer, Snehal M Pinto Pereira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tom NorrisDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9140-0776
Rachel CooperAGE Research Group, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Victoria GarfieldUnit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK.
Mark HamerDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8726-7992
Snehal M Pinto PereiraDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0876-8757

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the dominant direction of association between cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and grip strength could help refine physical activity recommendations. We performed a Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis to elucidate the bidirectional relationship between CRF and grip strength (GS). Using an inverse-variance weighted (IVW) MR framework, we estimated the strength of the GS (exposure)-CRF (outcome) association using genome-wide association summary data. When examining the CRF (exposure)-GS (outcome) association, the CRF genetic instrument was related to individual-level GS phenotypic data in 367 693 UK Biobank participants. Several sensitivity analyses were performed (e.g., MR-Egger, MR-weighted median estimator and MR-PRESSO) and both measures were scaled by body weight (w). In the direction GS-to-CRF, a 1-unit increase in GSw (i.e., GS/weight) was associated with 1.70 mL/kg/min (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14,2.27) higher CRFw (IVW model). This finding persisted across most sensitivity analyses. In the reverse direction, there was no evidence supporting an effect of CRFw on GSw, e.g., a 1-unit increase in CRFw led to a 0.00 kg/kg (95% CI: -0.01,0.02) higher GSw (IVW model). Our finding of a dominant direction of association from greater GS to higher CRF is relevant when considering how to promote physical activity guidelines. For example, placing too much emphasis on improving/maintaining CRF is unlikely to result in maximum benefits for other fundamental components of physical fitness, particularly muscle strength.

Indexed as

Cardiorespiratory FitnessHand StrengthMendelian Randomization AnalysisFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMalePolymorphism, Single Nucleotidecardiorespiratory fitnessgrip strengthMendelian randomizationUK Biobank

Identifiers

PMID39641749
PMCPMC11623293

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.