ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2024
Drug Treatments for Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Targeting Signaling Pathways and Homeostasis.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social regression stems from a latent phase of GABAergic dysfunction and sensory breakdown in a model of synaptopathy.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Review
- Blarcamesine improves EEG biomarkers of cortical dysfunction in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Neocortical neurogenesis: a proneural gene perspective.The FEBS journal · 2025Review
- A Blueprint for Translational Precision Medicine in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Related Neurogenetic Syndromes.Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology · 2025Review
- The role of neuroendocrine differentiation in treatment resistance of prostate cancer and intervention strategies.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Disclosing the Complexities of Childhood Neurodevelopmental Disorders.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of the reviewPreclinical and clinical evidence support the notion that neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) are synaptic disorders, characterized by excitatory-inhibitory imbalance. Despite this, NDD drug development programs targeting glutamate or gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors have been largely unsuccessful. Nonetheless, recent drug trials in Rett syndrome (RTT), fragile X syndrome (FXS), and other NDDs targeting other mechanisms have met their endpoints. The purpose of this review is to identify the basis of these successful studies. RECENT
findingsDespite increasing evidence of disruption in synaptic homeostasis, most genetic variants associated with NDDs implicate proteins involved in cell regulation and not in neurotransmission. Metabolic processes, in particular mitochondrial function, appear to play a role in NDD pathophysiology. NDDs are also characterized by distinctive cell signaling abnormalities, which link cellular and synaptic homeostasis. Recent successful trials in NDDs, including those of trofinetide, the first drug specifically approved for one of these disorders (i.e., RTT), implicate the targeting of downstream processes (i.e., signaling pathways) rather than neurotransmitter receptors. Recent positive drug studies in NDDs and their underlying mechanisms, in conjunction with new knowledge on the pathophysiology of these disorders, support the concept that targeting signaling and cellular and synaptic homeostasis may be a preferred approach for ameliorating synaptic abnormalities in many NDDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39641900What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.