Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39642108›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2024

Barriers and facilitators for the use of telehealth by healthcare providers in India-A systematic review.

Parth Sharma, Shirish Rao, Padmavathy Krishna Kumar, Aiswarya R Nair, Disha Agrawal, Siddhesh Zadey, Gayathri Surendran, Rachna George Joseph, Girish Dayma, Liya Rafeekh and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Parth SharmaAssociation for Socially Applicable Research (ASAR), Pune, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4954-6031
Shirish RaoAssociation for Socially Applicable Research (ASAR), Pune, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1150-4581
Padmavathy Krishna KumarAssociation for Socially Applicable Research (ASAR), Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Aiswarya R NairTravancore Medical College, Kollam, Kerala, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4303-0619
Disha AgrawalAssociation for Socially Applicable Research (ASAR), Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Siddhesh ZadeyAssociation for Socially Applicable Research (ASAR), Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Gayathri SurendranChristian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Rachna George JosephChristian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Girish DaymaKEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6314-8198
Liya RafeekhIndian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India.
Shubhashis SahaChristian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9655-3237
Sitanshi SharmaCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for applied studies, Delhi, India.
S S PrakashChristian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0538-1001
Venkatesan SankarapandianChristian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Preethi JohnGlobal Business School for Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Vikram PatelHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Maryland, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely assumed that telehealth tools like mHealth (mobile health), telemedicine, and tele-education can supplement the efficiency of Healthcare Providers (HCPs). We conducted a systematic review of evidence on the barriers and facilitators associated with the use of telehealth by HCPs in India. A systematic literature search following a pre-registered protocol (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KQ3U9 [PROTOCOL DOI]) was conducted on PubMed. The search strategy, inclusion, and exclusion criteria were based on the World Health Organization's action framework on Human Resources for Health (HRH) and Universal Health Coverage (UHC) in India with a specific focus on telehealth tools. Eligible articles published in English from 1st January 2001 to 17th February 2022 were included. One hundred and six studies were included in the review. Of these, 53 studies (50%) involved mHealth interventions, 25 (23.6%) involved telemedicine interventions whereas the remaining 28 (26.4%) involved the use of tele-education interventions by HCPs in India. In each category, most of the studies followed a quantitative study design and were mostly published in the last 5 years. The study sites were more commonly present in states in south India. The facilitators and barriers related to each type of intervention were analyzed under the following sub-headings- 1) Human resource related, 2) Application related 3) Technical, and 4) Others. The interventions were most commonly used for improving the management of mental health, non-communicable diseases, and maternal and child health. The use of telehealth has not been uniformly studied in India. The facilitators and barriers to telehealth use need to be kept in mind while designing the intervention. Future studies should focus on looking at region-specific, intervention-specific, and health cadre-specific barriers and facilitators for the use of telehealth.

Identifiers

PMID39642108
PMCPMC11623477

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.