Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39644253›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2025

ProPickML: Advancing Clinical Diagnostics with Automated Peak Picking in Label-Free Targeted Proteomics.

Elloise Coyle, Mickaël Leclercq, Clarisse Gotti, Florence Roux-Dalvai, Arnaud Droit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elloise CoyleComputational Biology Laboratory, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec G1V 4G2, Canada.
Mickaël LeclercqComputational Biology Laboratory, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec G1V 4G2, Canada.
Clarisse GottiProteomics Platform, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec G1V 4G2, Canada.
Florence Roux-DalvaiProteomics Platform, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec G1V 4G2, Canada.
Arnaud DroitComputational Biology Laboratory, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec G1V 4G2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7922-790X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In targeted proteomics utilizing Selected Reaction Monitoring (SRM), the precise detection of specific peptides within complex mixtures remains a significant challenge, particularly due to noise and interference in chromatograms. Existing methodologies, such as isotopic labeling and scoring algorithms, offer partial solutions but are constrained by high run times and elevated false discovery rates. To address these limitations, we have developed ProPickML a machine learning-based tool designed to accurately identify peptide peaks across diverse data sets, independent of the assumed presence of the peptide. This model was trained on a manually labeled data set and subsequently validated to assess its predictive accuracy. The results demonstrate that the model reliably identifies peptide peaks in the presence of noise, achieving a Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.81 on an independent test data set, surpassing mProphet's MCC of 0.71. Implemented in R as ProPickML, this tool offers a competitive, cost-effective alternative to existing techniques, significantly reducing reliance on isotopic labeling and enhancing the accuracy of peptide identification in SRM workflows.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPeptidesProteomicsAlgorithmsHumansSoftwareWorkflowPeptidesdiagnosticsmachine learningpeak-pickingtargeted proteomics

Identifiers

PMID39644253
PMCPMC11705220

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.