Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39644907›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Haematology2025

Safety and efficacy of mitapivat in sickle cell disease (RISE UP): results from the phase 2 portion of a global, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

Modupe Idowu, Lucas Otieno, Bogdan Dumitriu, Clarisse L C Lobo, Swee Lay Thein, Biree Andemariam, Obiageli E Nnodu, Adlette Inati, Alexander K Glaros, Pablo Bartolucci and 18 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05031780 (A Phase 2/3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mitapivat in Subjects With Sickle Cell Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05031780 phase2 / phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

A Phase 2/3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mitapivat in Subjects With Sickle Cell Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorAgios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ran2022 to 2030Enrolled286ConditionsSickle Cell DiseaseArmsMitapivat, Mitapivat-matching placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Management of Kidney Disease with Sickle Cell Disease.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Modupe IdowuMcGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: modupe.idowu@uth.tmc.edu.
Lucas OtienoVictoria Biomedical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
Bogdan DumitriuMid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group, Largo, MD, USA.
Clarisse L C LoboResearch Division, HEMORIO, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Swee Lay TheinSickle Cell Branch, The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Biree AndemariamNew England Sickle Cell Institute, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, USA.
Obiageli E NnoduCentre of Excellence for Sickle Cell Disease Research and Training, Department of Haematology and Blood Transfusion, College of Health Sciences, University of Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria.
Adlette InatiLAU Gilbert and Rose-Marie Chaghoury School of Medicine, Byblos and NINI Hospital, Tripoli, Lebanon.
Alexander K GlarosCentral Michigan University, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI, USA.
Pablo BartolucciUniv Paris Est Créteil, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, APHP, Sickle Cell and Red Cell Disorders Referral Center-UMGGR, Créteil, France; IMRB Laboratory of Excellence LABEX Grex, Créteil, France; Clinical Investigation Center 1430, Créteil, France.
Raffaella ColombattiPediatric Hematology Oncology Unit, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Ali T TaherAmerican University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Miguel R AbboudAmerican University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Deepika DarbariChildren's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Kenneth I AtagaCenter for Sickle Cell Disease, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Ali Bülent AntmenAcıbadem Adana Hospital, Pediatric Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Adana, Turkey.
Kevin H M KuoDivision of Haematology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Samuel de Souza MedinaHematology and Transfusion Medicine Center University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Abdulafeez OluyadiAgios Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Varsha IyerFog Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Susan MorrisAgios Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Amber M YatesAgios Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Hui ShaoAgios Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Spurthi PatilAgios Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Rolandas UrbstonaitisAgios Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Ahmar U ZaidiAgios Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Sarah GheuensAgios Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Wally R SmithVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSickle cell disease, a debilitating, inherited haemolytic anaemia with premature morbidity and mortality, affects millions globally. Mitapivat, a first-in-class, oral, allosteric activator of pyruvate kinase, improves red blood cell survival by increasing ATP and diminishes sickling by decreasing 2,3-diphosphoglycerate. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mitapivat in patients with sickle cell disease.

methodsWe report results from the phase 2, 12-week, double-blind period of RISE UP, a global, phase 2/3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. The phase 2 part of the study was conducted at 32 clinical study sites across 13 countries. Patients aged 16 years or older with a confirmed diagnosis of sickle cell disease (any genotype), baseline haemoglobin of 5·5-10·5 g/dL (inclusive), and two to ten sickle cell pain crises within 12 months before providing informed consent, were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive oral mitapivat 50 mg, 100 mg, or placebo twice daily, in this portion of the study which is now complete. Randomisation was performed using a permuted-block method and concealed with an interactive response system; patients, investigators, and individuals assessing outcomes were masked to treatment assignment. Primary efficacy and safety endpoints were haemoglobin response (≥1·0 g/dL increase from baseline in average haemoglobin concentration from week 10 through week 12), and type, severity, and relationship to study drug of adverse and serious adverse events. Efficacy and safety endpoints were evaluated in the full analysis set (all randomly assigned patients) and safety analysis set (all patients who received at least one dose of study drug), respectively. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as part of an ongoing phase 2/3 study (NCT05031780).

findingsBetween Jan 19, 2022, and April 25, 2023, 79 patients were randomly assigned (51 [65%] female, 28 [35%] male; 46 [58%] Black or African American, 26 [33%] White, five [6%] multiracial, two [3%] Asian); 26 received mitapivat 50 mg, 26 received mitapivat 100 mg, and 27 received placebo, twice daily. Both treatment groups showed a statistically significant haemoglobin response rate versus placebo (12 [46%] of 26 patients in the mitapivat 50 mg group and 13 [50%] of 26 patients in the mitapivat 100 mg group, versus one [4%] of 27 patients in the placebo group; two-sided p=0·0003 and p=0·0001, respectively). Mitapivat was generally well tolerated. Serious adverse events were reported in two (8%) of 26 patients in the mitapivat 50 mg group, four (15%) of 26 patients in the mitapivat 100 mg group, and three (11%) of 27 patients in the placebo group; grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in three (12%), five (19%), and two (7%) patients, respectively. No serious or grade 3 or worse adverse events were considered treatment related and there were no treatment-related deaths. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were infections and infestations, and included one patient in the placebo group with an infected skin ulcer, one patient in the mitapivat 50 mg group with meningitis and one with pelvic inflammatory disease, and one patient each with malaria, pneumonia, and tonsillitis in the mitapivat 100 mg group.

interpretationMitapivat, through its dual effect of increasing ATP and decreasing 2,3-diphosphoglycerate, could provide clinical benefit to patients with sickle cell disease. These results support continued evaluation of mitapivat in the phase 3 portion of the study.

fundingAgios Pharmaceuticals.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellAdolescentAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.