ArticleBMJ open quality2024
Creation of the Indigenous Support Line for health system navigation and culturally safe access to care: a quality improvement project.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Indigenous Peoples face inequities in health and healthcare access due to colonial history and systems. To work towards the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada's Calls to Action and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Alberta Health Services has collaborated with a Wisdom Council of engaged Elders and Indigenous community members to tailor programmes for Indigenous Peoples. The Indigenous Support Line (ISL) was created based on the Wisdom Council's advice to provide an Indigenous-specific concerns line, which later expanded into a telehealth line to address any health questions or access issues, including health system navigation and access to Western and Indigenous health and wellness supports. Working from an ethical space guided the process, and Indigenous ways of knowing and Western approaches were respectfully integrated throughout. The percentage of calls answered or abandoned within 10 min was tracked as a key measure for quality improvement, coupled with a patient survey to measure access, accessibility, effectiveness and safety that included several open-ended questions that were treated as qualitative data and analysed using thematic analysis. Between June 2022 and February 2024, 92.7% of inbound calls were answered or abandoned within 10 min. A total of 86 respondents completed the survey, with 100% indicating they were satisfied with the service. Qualitative findings showed respondents felt satisfied with the line and the Indigenous Listeners, were respected during their call, and felt supported to have their concerns addressed. The ISL was successful in increasing Indigenous Peoples' access to care in a culturally safe environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.