Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39645650›Full record

ArticleThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2025

CRISPR/Cas9-driven double modification of grapevine MLO6-7 imparts powdery mildew resistance, while editing of NPR3 augments powdery and downy mildew tolerance.

Loredana Moffa, Giuseppe Mannino, Ivan Bevilacqua, Giorgio Gambino, Irene Perrone, Chiara Pagliarani, Cinzia Margherita Bertea, Alberto Spada, Anna Narduzzo, Elisa Zizzamia and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Strategies for plant-virus disease management from gene editing to nanotechnology.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Loredana Moffa *Council for Agricultural Research and Economics - Research Centre for Viticulture and Enology, Via XXVIII Aprile 26, 31015, Conegliano, TV, Italy.
Giuseppe Mannino *Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, Plant Physiology Unit, University of Turin, Via Quarello 15/A, 10135, Turin, Italy.
Ivan Bevilacqua *Council for Agricultural Research and Economics - Research Centre for Viticulture and Enology, Via XXVIII Aprile 26, 31015, Conegliano, TV, Italy.
Giorgio GambinoInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council, Strada delle Cacce 73, 10135, Torino, Italy.
Irene PerroneInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council, Strada delle Cacce 73, 10135, Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5129-1571
Chiara PagliaraniInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council, Strada delle Cacce 73, 10135, Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4656-6192
Cinzia Margherita BerteaDepartment of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, Plant Physiology Unit, University of Turin, Via Quarello 15/A, 10135, Turin, Italy.
Alberto SpadaCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics - Research Centre for Viticulture and Enology, Via XXVIII Aprile 26, 31015, Conegliano, TV, Italy.
Anna NarduzzoCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics - Research Centre for Viticulture and Enology, Via XXVIII Aprile 26, 31015, Conegliano, TV, Italy.
Elisa ZizzamiaCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics - Research Centre for Viticulture and Enology, Via XXVIII Aprile 26, 31015, Conegliano, TV, Italy.
Riccardo VelascoCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics - Research Centre for Viticulture and Enology, Via XXVIII Aprile 26, 31015, Conegliano, TV, Italy.
Walter Chitarra *Council for Agricultural Research and Economics - Research Centre for Viticulture and Enology, Via XXVIII Aprile 26, 31015, Conegliano, TV, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5382-3794
Luca Nerva *Council for Agricultural Research and Economics - Research Centre for Viticulture and Enology, Via XXVIII Aprile 26, 31015, Conegliano, TV, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5009-5798

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Council 101135088Ministero delle Politiche Agricole Alimentari e Forestali BIOTECH-VITECH
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of genome editing strategies in grapevine is the easiest way to improve sustainability and resilience while preserving the original genotype. Among others, the Mildew Locus-O (MLO) genes have already been reported as good candidates to develop powdery mildew-immune plants. A never-explored grapevine target is NPR3, a negative regulator of the systemic acquired resistance. We report the exploitation of a cisgenic approach with the Cre-lox recombinase technology to generate grapevine-edited plants with the potential to be transgene-free while preserving their original genetic background. The characterization of three edited lines for each target demonstrated immunity development against Erysiphe necator in MLO6-7-edited plants. Concomitantly, a significant improvement of resilience, associated with increased leaf thickness and specific biochemical responses, was observed in defective NPR3 lines against E. necator and Plasmopara viticola. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that both MLO6-7 and NPR3 defective lines modulated their gene expression profiles, pointing to distinct though partially overlapping responses. Furthermore, targeted metabolite analysis highlighted an overaccumulation of stilbenes coupled with an improved oxidative scavenging potential in both editing targets, likely protecting the MLO6-7 mutants from detrimental pleiotropic effects. Finally, the Cre-loxP approach allowed the recovery of one MLO6-7 edited plant with the complete removal of transgene. Taken together, our achievements provide a comprehensive understanding of the molecular and biochemical adjustments occurring in double MLO-defective grape plants. In parallel, the potential of NPR3 mutants for multiple purposes has been demonstrated, raising new questions on its wide role in orchestrating biotic stress responses.

Indexed as

AscomycotaCRISPR-Cas SystemsDisease ResistancePlant DiseasesPlant ProteinsVitisErysipheGene EditingPlants, Genetically ModifiedPlant ProteinsErysiphe necatorNew Plant Breeding Techniques (NPBTs)Plasmopara viticolastilbenesVitis vinifera

Identifiers

PMID39645650
PMCPMC12034322

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.