ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025
Interleaved flow-sensitive dephasing (iFSD): Toward enhanced blood flow suppression and preserved T
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interleaved flow-sensitive dephasing (iFSD): Toward enhanced blood flow suppression and preserved TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop and validate a 3D turbo spin-echo (TSE)-compatible approach to enhancing black-blood (BB) effects while preserving T
methodsFollowing the excitation RF pulse, a 180° RF pulse sandwiched by a pair of flow-sensitive dephasing (FSD) gradient pulses in the phase- (y) and partition-encoding (z) directions, respectively, is added. The polarity of FSD gradients in z direction is toggled every TR, achieving an interleaved FSD (iFSD) configuration in y-z plane. The technique was optimized and evaluated in 18 healthy volunteers and 32 patients with neurovascular disease or brain metastases. Comparisons were made among TSE with and without one of BB preparations: iFSD, delay alternating with nutation for tailored excitation, and motion-sensitized driven equilibrium.
resultsiFSD-TSE achieved the best blood flow suppression indicated by venous sinus SNR and parenchyma-to-sinus contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). iFSD-TSE yielded slightly lower white matter SNR (106.6 ± 32.9) and white-to-gray matter CNR (27.3 ± 8.1) compared to TSE (111.4 ± 31.5 and 28.6 ± 8.8), which were significantly higher than those of delay alternating with nutation for tailored excitation-prepared TSE (84.3 ± 25.0 and 16.8 ± 4.8) and motion-sensitized driven equilibrium-prepared TSE (77.3 ± 26.6 and 15.9 ± 5.3). At the neurovascular wall lesions, iFSD-TSE yielded the highest wall-to-lumen CNR among the three sequences with a BB preparation, all of which significantly outperformed TSE. iFSD-TSE effectively suppressed slow-flow artifacts that otherwise mimicked an atherosclerotic lesion or strongly contrast-enhancing vessel wall. In diagnosing brain metastases, iFSD allowed for highest inter-reader agreement (κ 0.75) and shortest reading time.
conclusioniFSD is a promising approach compatible with 3D TSE for robust blood flow suppression and preserved T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.