ArticleJournal of clinical & experimental cardiology2024
Exploring Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation as a Treatment Approach for Recurrent Ventricular Arrhythmias: A Concise Review.
Article in Journal of clinical & experimental cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of Bilateral Sympathetic Nerve Cryoablation as a Bridge to Transplant for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia.Annals of thoracic surgery short reports · 2026Article
- Cardiac Sympathetic Neuromodulation in the Management of Refractory Electrical Storm: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Target delineation workflow and outcomes of stereotactic cardiac radioablation.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- Association of dysautonomia with refractory ventricular tachyarrhythmia in patients requiring thoracoscopic surgical cardiac sympathetic denervation.JTCVS open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Surgical Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation (CSD) has gained traction as a promising neuromodulatory therapy for Refractory Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias (RVT), particularly in patients with channelopathies and Ischemic (ICM) and Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathies (NICM) who are refractory to conventional treatment. This mini review examines the pathophysiological role of the sympathetic nervous system in RVT and assesses the efficacy of Bilateral CSD (BCSD) through a literature review. Historical perspectives have traced the evolution of CSD from its initial use in intractable angina to its current application in ventricular arrhythmias. BCSD is associated with improved outcomes for refractory ventricular arrhythmias, with studies demonstrating approximately 60% reductions in implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks and over 50% shock-and transplant-free survival at 1 year after BCSD. Notably, the 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS guidelines recommend Left CSD (LCSD) for certain etiologies of RVT, including congenital long QT syndrome, Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia (CPVT), and VT/VF storm. Both Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) and Robot-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (RATS) BCSD are performed, with shorter operative times for RATS. Yet, most RVT CSD studies have a small sample size; therefore, complications may be underreported because the studies are underpowered. Although BCSD has superior reported outcomes with respect to left CSD, there may be confounding factors due to the selection of healthier patients for BCSD. Additional comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness data are needed to guide clinical practice. In conclusion, BCSD can restore the quality of life of severely impacted RVT patients; however, the benefits must be weighed against procedure-related risks, and further research should clarify the impact on long-term morbidity and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39649113PMC11623387What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.