Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39649337›Full record

ArticleJamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa)2024

Disaster preparedness: The role of spatial disaster learning using geospatial technology.

Budi Handoyo, Hadi Soekamto, Alfyananda K Putra, Puspita A Kamil, Fajar Wulandari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Jamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Budi HandoyoDepartment of Geography, Faculty of Social Science, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-3788
Hadi SoekamtoDepartment of Geography, Faculty of Social Science, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2257-7527
Alfyananda K PutraDepartment of Geography, Faculty of Social Science, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2016-4144
Puspita A KamilDepartment of Geography Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5837-4553
Fajar WulandariInstitut Sains dan Bisnis Internasional, Singkawang, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4282-0157

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preparedness for natural disasters is crucial for people living in high-risk areas along the Ring of Fire, such as people in Indonesia. Although Spatial Disaster Learning using Geospatial Technology (SDL-GeoTech) has been developed, its effectiveness in enhancing students' preparedness remains unproven. This study examines the impact of SDL-GeoTech on junior high school students' readiness using a quasi-experimental, time-series, single-group pre-post-test design. The research involved students from three schools: SMA 1 Grati Pasuruan (flood-prone), SMA 1 Puncu Kediri (volcanic eruption-prone), and SMA 3 Mataram Lombok (earthquake-prone). Data were collected through tests on knowledge, skills, and attitudes, followed by Contribution: This research teaches students to use techno-geospatial learning through SDL-GeoTech, equipping those in the Ring of Fire region to be better prepared for potential natural disasters such as earthquakes and floods. The proven analysis of SDL-GeoTech has shown that it enhances students' knowledge, skills and attitude in preparedness in dealing with disasters.

Indexed as

disastergeospatial technologylearning strategypreparednessspatial learning

Identifiers

PMID39649337
PMCPMC11621869

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.