Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39649349›Full record

ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2024

Development of strategies to enhance recordkeeping during intrapartum care in Limpopo province: A Delphi technique.

Phogole C Maesela, Johanna M Mathibe-Neke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Phogole C MaeselaDepartment of Health Studies, School of Social Sciences, College of Human Sciences, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7997-8267
Johanna M Mathibe-NekeDepartment of Health Studies, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5811-8680

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: South Africa is experiencing increased medico-legal litigations in maternity services arising from poor recordkeeping. To enhance the quality of recordkeeping and reduce the lawsuits, the strategies were developed and validated by maternal healthcare experts. Aim: The study is aimed to develop and validate strategies for recordkeeping during intrapartum care in Limpopo province. Setting: The study was conducted in seven hospitals located in Sekhukhune District, Limpopo province. Methods: The hospitals were purposefully selected to participate in this study. A sequential explanatory mixed-method design was applied. For the quantitative phase, the maternity case records were reviewed for completeness. Statistician assisted in translation of the checklist into statistical package for social science (SPSS) program. The data analysis included descriptive and inferential statistics. The qualitative phase, focus group discussions and in-depth interviews were conducted with midwives and doctors to describe and determine their perceptions and experiences of recordkeeping during intrapartum. A co-coder was engaged in qualitative data analysis. The findings of quantitative and qualitative phases were integrated to develop the strategies for recordkeeping. A two-rounds Delphi technique was employed to validate the strategies by engaging maternal healthcare experts. Results: Ten (10) strategies to enhance recordkeeping were developed and validated by the experts. Conclusion: The proposed strategies were operationalised into interventions with the aim to improve recordkeeping. Contribution: The strategies aim to improve the quality-of-service provision during intrapartum care and reduce or culminate legal claims in Limpopo province.

Indexed as

Delphi techniqueintrapartum carematernity case recordrecordkeepingstrategy

Identifiers

PMID39649349
PMCPMC11621868

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.