ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2024
Cardiologists vs Endocrinologists in Glycemic Control for Coronary Artery Disease Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The comorbidity of coronary artery disease (CAD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) presents significant challenges in clinical management, particularly regarding glycemic control. The clinical management of CAD complicated by T2DM requires coordinated glycemic control, as poor management can exacerbate cardiovascular risks and increase morbidity and mortality. While endocrinologists traditionally manage diabetes, cardiologists are increasingly involved due to the cardiovascular risks associated with poor glycemic control. This study explores the current practices of glycemic management by cardiologists and endocrinologists in patients with CAD and T2DM, focusing on treatment intensification in a Chinese hospital setting. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 1,074 hospitalized patients with both CAD and T2DM, admitted to the Cardiology Department of Ruijin Hospital between January 2021 and December 2023. Data were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records, including demographic information, clinical characteristics, and treatment interventions. Patients were stratified by year, and differences in treatment strategies between cardiologists and endocrinologists were analyzed. Glycemic control was assessed using HbA1c levels, with treatment intensification defined by any adjustment in antidiabetic therapy and consideration for comprehensive cardiovascular risk factors. Results: Endocrinologists were significantly more likely to initiate treatment intensification, especially in cases of severe hyperglycemia (HbA1c ≥9.0%), while cardiologists' role in glycemic management was limited, with a preference for outpatient endocrinology referrals over in-hospital adjustments. Despite improvements in glycemic control, the percentage of patients achieving comprehensive cardiovascular risk management targets remained low. Conclusion: This study underscored the distinct yet complementary roles of cardiologists and endocrinologists in managing glycemic control among patients with CAD and T2DM, noting endocrinologists' more active involvement in treatment intensification. Future integrated care models should harness the unique expertise of both specialties to optimize patient outcomes, better address glycemic control needs, and enhance overall cardiovascular risk management in this high-risk patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.