Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39649879›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024

Role of artificial intelligence in predicting neurological outcomes in postcardiac resuscitation.

Muhammad Muneeb Khawar, Hafiz Abdus Saboor, Rahul Eric, Nimra R Arain, Saira Bano, Mawada B Mohamed Abaker, Batool I Siddiqui, Reynaldo R Figueroa, Srija R Koppula, Hira Fatima and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Muhammad Muneeb KhawarKing Edward Medical University, Rana Nursery Okara.
Hafiz Abdus SaboorKing Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Rahul EricNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Nimra R ArainSouth City Hospital Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan.
Saira BanoEvergreen Hospital Kirkland, Washington, USA.
Mawada B Mohamed AbakerSudan Heart Center, Arkwit, Khartoum, Sudan.
Batool I SiddiquiZiauddin University, Clifton Karachi.
Reynaldo R FigueroaUniversity Hospital San Vicente de Paul, Nagua, Dominican Republic.
Srija R KoppulaKakatiya Medical College, Warangal, Telangana, India.
Hira FatimaUnited Medical and Dental College, New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada.
Afreen BegumESIC Medical College and Hospital, Telangana, Hyderabad.
Sana AnwarLugansk State Medical University, Texas, Ukraine.
Muhammad U KhalidKing Edward Medical University Lahore, Mayo Hospital, Lahore.
Usama JamilKabul University, Afghanistan.
Javed IqbalKing Edward Medical University Lahore, Mayo Hospital, Lahore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Being an extremely high mortality rate condition, cardiac arrest cases have rightfully been evaluated via various studies and scoring factors for effective resuscitative practices and neurological outcomes postresuscitation. This narrative review aims to explore the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting neurological outcomes postcardiac resuscitation. The methodology involved a detailed review of all relevant recent studies of AI, different machine learning algorithms, prediction tools, and assessing their benefit in predicting neurological outcomes in postcardiac resuscitation cases as compared to more traditional prognostic scoring systems and tools. Previously, outcome determining clinical, blood, and radiological factors were prone to other influencing factors like limited accuracy and time constraints. Studies conducted also emphasized that to predict poor neurological outcomes, a more multimodal approach helped adjust for confounding factors, interpret diverse datasets, and provide a reliable prognosis, which only demonstrates the need for AI to help overcome challenges faced. Advanced machine learning algorithms like artificial neural networks (ANN) using supervised learning by AI have improved the accuracy of prognostic models outperforming conventional models. Several real-world cases of effective AI-powered algorithm models have been cited here. Studies comparing machine learning tools like XGBoost, AI Watson, hyperspectral imaging, ChatGPT-4, and AI-based gradient boosting have noted their beneficial uses. AI could help reduce workload, healthcare costs, and help personalize care, process vast genetic and lifestyle data and help reduce side effects from treatments. Limitations of AI have been covered extensively in this article, including data quality, bias, privacy issues, and transparency. Our objectives should be to use more diverse data sources, use interpretable data output giving process explanation, validation method, and implement policies to safeguard patient data. Despite the limitations, the advancements already made by AI and its potential in predicting neurological outcomes in postcardiac resuscitation cases has been quite promising and boosts a continually improving system, albeit requiring close human supervision with training and improving models, with plans to educate clinicians, the public and sharing collected data.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemachine learningneurological outcomespostcardiac resuscitation

Identifiers

PMID39649879
PMCPMC11623902

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.