ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
SLNP-based CDK4- targeted nanotherapy against glioblastoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Glioblastoma is a grade IV solid brain tumor and has a 15-month survival rate even after treatment. Glioblastoma development is heavily influenced by retinoblastoma protein (pRB) pathway changes. The blood-brain barrier, drug resistance, and severe toxicity of Temozolamide are key obstacles in treating glioblastoma. Innovative treatments targeting the pRB pathway with efficient delivery vehicles are required to treat glioblastoma. Methods: For this purpose, a library of 691 plant extracts previously tested Results: Silymarin (Sil) was identified as the most potent compound against CDK4, which was then encapsulated in stearic acid solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNP-Sil). Sil showed decreased cell viability 72 h after treatment against both U87 and U251 cell lines but had negligible cytotoxic effect on HEK-293. IC50 value of Sil was 155.14 µM for U87 and 195.93 µM for U251. Sil and SLNP-Sil effectively inhibited U87 and U251 cell migration 24 h after treatment. Discussion: Our results indicated that Sil and SLNP-Sil are promising therapeutic approaches against glioblastoma and merit
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.