ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Drug-induced hearing disorders: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disproportionality analysis of drug-associated tinnitus safety signals: a 43-year pharmacovigilance study.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- A real-world pharmacovigilance study of bempedoic acid plus ezetimibe fixed-dose combination based on the FDA FAERS database.Medicine · 2026Article
- Drug-induced second tumors: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Neurological adverse events associated with baclofen: a pharmacovigilance study based on FDA adverse event reporting system.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Safety assessment of Osilodrostat: The adverse event analysis based on FAERS database by means of disproportionality analysis.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To evaluate and identify reports of adverse events related to hearing impairment with drugs approved in the past 20 years, to identify new adverse reaction signals related to hearing impairment that have not yet been reported, and to improve the safety of drug treatments. Methods: The adverse event report data from the FAERS database from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2023 were retrieved. "Hearing disorders" was used as the keyword to screen for drugs related to the adverse event. After standardizing the drug name and the adverse drug event name, the adverse event reports with hearing disorders as the main suspect were collected, and the proportional imbalance algorithm was used to detect the potential adverse event signals to drug-related hearing impairment. Results: The top five drugs with the highest number of reported adverse events to hearing impairment were sacubitril/valsartan (2,674), adalimumab (2,479), etanercept (1,834), tofacitinib (1,812), and apixaban (1,600). Except for adalimumab, the risk of hearing impairment is not mentioned in the instructions. The top five drugs for new signal strength are pancuronium ( Conclusion: Our study covered 20 years of real-world data on reports of adverse events related to hearing impairment in the FAERS database, validating previous reports and studies, as well as identifying drugs that signal new adverse events of hearing impairment, especially some drugs commonly used for the treatment of chronic diseases (a combination of hypoglycemic drugs, antihypertensive drugs, and lipid modulators) and some new drugs in the 5-year post-market period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.