SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2024
Statin exposure and risk of colorectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association between statin use and the risk of colorectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- The value of systemic inflammatory response index in evaluating the prognosis of postoperative patients with stage II colon cancer.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Does statin have a chemopreventive effect in patients with ulcerative colitis?Intestinal research · 2025Article
- Chemopreventive Effects of Statins and Aspirin on Colorectal Cancer Among Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Evidence of a Synergistic Association from a Large Cohort.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Atorvastatin as an immunomodulatory adjunct in ulcerative colitis, beyond lipid lowering to inflammation control: a randomized controlled pilot study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While epidemiological studies have linked statin use to a reduced risk of advanced colorectal adenomas, its impact on colorectal cancer (CRC) risk in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains unclear. To our knowledge, no meta-analysis to date has specifically examined this association. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available observational studies to investigate the risk of CRC associated with statin use in IBD patients. Methods: We searched three databases for articles published in English before September 2024, focusing on the protective effects of statins against CRC in IBD patients. We calculated multivariate odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess this association. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using the generic inverse variance method. Results: The meta-analysis included 4 studies encompassing 22,250 IBD patients, 6,712 of whom were statin users. The methodological quality of three of the studies was deemed high. We found a significantly lower risk of CRC in statin users compared to non-users, with a pooled relative risk of 1.88 (95% CI 1.54-2.30). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the consistency of these findings. Conclusion: Statin use appears to be associated with a reduced risk of CRC in patients with IBD. However, given the limited number of studies available, further prospective research with large sample size is necessary to confirm the potential chemopreventive role of statins in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.