Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39650310›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in biomedical engineering2024

Computational modeling of autonomic nerve stimulation: Vagus et al.

Warren M Grill, Nicole A Pelot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Warren M GrillDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University.
Nicole A PelotDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University.

Funding

RECONSTRUCTING VAGAL ANATOMY75N98022C00018 · OD · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI SHOFFSTALL, ANDREW · 2022 to 2024
$15.8M
A Rational Engineering Design Approach to Minimizing the Off-Target Effects of Baroreceptor Activation TherapyR01EB033403 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI LUDWIG, KIP A · 2022 to 2025
$2.5M
Optimized Electrical Block of Peripheral NervesR01NS126376 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Warren M. Grill · 2023 to 2026
$2.0M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB033403NIH HHS 75N98022C00018NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS126376
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational models of electrical stimulation, block and recording of autonomic nerves enable analysis of mechanisms of action underlying neural responses and design of optimized stimulation parameters. We reviewed advances in computational modeling of autonomic nerve stimulation, block, and recording over the past five years, with a focus on vagus nerve stimulation, including both implanted and less invasive approaches. Few models achieved quantitative validation, but integrated computational pipelines increase the reproducibility, reusability, and accessibility of computational modeling. Model-based optimization enabled design of electrode geometries and stimulation parameters for selective activation (across fiber locations or types). Growing efforts link models of neural activity to downstream physiological responses to represent more directly the therapeutic effects and side effects of stimulation. Thus, computational modeling is an increasingly important tool for analysis and design of bioelectronic therapies.

Indexed as

Autonomic nerve stimulationComputational modelingNeural engineeringNeuromodulationPeripheral nerve stimulationVagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39650310
PMCPMC11619812

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.