Evidence mapPaperPMID 39651986Full record

ReviewDiabetes care2025

2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetes care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07084350 (Efficacy and Safety of Oral Lactulose Combined With Polyethylene Glycol Electrolytes Powder), which is not on this map. Cited by 655 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
655citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07084350 nacompletednot on this map

Efficacy and Safety of Oral Lactulose Combined With Polyethylene Glycol Electrolytes Powder (PEG-ELS) for Bowel Preparation in Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeneral Hospital of Shenyang Military RegionRan2025 to 2026Enrolled300ConditionsType II Diabetes MellitusArmslactulose, PEG (solution given 4 L)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

655 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. [Proliferative diabetic retinopathy: fewer complications with early surgery].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

595 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusStandard of CareHumansPractice Guidelines as Topic

Identifiers

PMID39651986
PMCPMC11635041

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.