Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39652543›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

The impact of host genetics on porcine gut microbiota composition excluding maternal and postnatal environmental influences.

Ana Heras-Molina, Jordi Estellé, Marta Vázquez-Gómez, Adrián López-García, José-Luis Pesantez-Pacheco, Susana Astiz, Consolación Garcia-Contreras, Rosa Escudero, Beatriz Isabel, Antonio Gonzalez-Bulnes and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ana Heras-MolinaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, UCM, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7496-9680
Jordi EstelléUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Marta Vázquez-GómezSorbonne université, INSERM, Nutrition et obésités: approaches systémiques, Nutriomics, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8916-2086
Adrián López-GarcíaCSIC-INIA, Madrid, Spain.
José-Luis Pesantez-PachecoCSIC-INIA, Madrid, Spain.
Susana AstizCSIC-INIA, Madrid, Spain.
Consolación Garcia-ContrerasCSIC-INIA, Madrid, Spain.
Rosa EscuderoFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, UCM, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, Madrid, Spain.
Beatriz IsabelFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, UCM, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, Madrid, Spain.
Antonio Gonzalez-BulnesFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain.
Cristina ÓviloCSIC-INIA, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5738-8435

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiota of the pig is being increasingly studied due to its implications for host homeostasis and the importance of the pig as a meat source and biomedical model of human diseases. However, most studies comparing the microbiome between different breeds do not consider the influence of maternal environment during the colonization of the microbiota. The aim of the present study was to compare the gut microbiota during postnatal growth between two pig genotypes (purebred Iberian vs. crossbreds Iberian x Large White pigs), gestated in a single maternal environment (pure Iberian mothers) inseminated with heterospermic semen. Postnatally, piglets were maintained in the same environmental conditions, and their microbiota was studied at 60 and 210 days old. Results showed that age had the greatest influence on alpha and beta diversity, and genotype also affected beta diversity at both ages. There were differences in the microbiome profile between genotypes at the ASV and genus levels when jointly analyzing the total number of samples, which may help to explain phenotypical differences. When each time-point was analyzed individually, there were more differences at 210 days-old than 60 days-old. Fecal short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) were also affected by age, but not by genotype. These results may be a basis for further research on host genotype interactions with the gut microbiota.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsFatty Acids, VolatileFecesFemaleGenotypeMaleSwineFatty Acids, Volatile

Identifiers

PMID39652543
PMCPMC11627362

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.