Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39652592›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

Differential quantification of alternative splicing events on spliced pangenome graphs.

Simone Ciccolella, Davide Cozzi, Gianluca Della Vedova, Stephen Njuguna Kuria, Paola Bonizzoni, Luca Denti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Accessing crop genetic diversity via pangenomics.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Simone CiccolellaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Davide CozziDepartment of Computer Science, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Gianluca Della VedovaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Stephen Njuguna KuriaDepartment of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Pwani University, Kilifi, Kenya.
Paola BonizzoniDepartment of Computer Science, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Luca DentiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8786-2276

Funding

European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programmePangenome Informatics: from Theory to Applications (PB)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pangenomes are becoming a powerful framework to perform many bioinformatics analyses taking into account the genetic variability of a population, thus reducing the bias introduced by a single reference genome. With the wider diffusion of pangenomes, integrating genetic variability with transcriptome diversity is becoming a natural extension that demands specific methods for its exploration. In this work, we extend the notion of spliced pangenomes to that of annotated spliced pangenomes; this allows us to introduce a formal definition of Alternative Splicing (AS) events on a graph structure. To investigate the usage of graph pangenomes for the quantification of AS events across conditions, we developed pantas, the first pangenomic method for the detection and differential analysis of AS events from short RNA-Seq reads. A comparison with state-of-the-art linear reference-based approaches proves that pantas achieves competitive accuracy, making spliced pangenomes effective for conducting AS events quantification and opening future directions for the analysis of population-based transcriptomes.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingComputational BiologyAlgorithmsGenomeGenomicsHumansSequence Analysis, RNATranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID39652592
PMCPMC11658704

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.